PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CBUF.DE vs. ISPA.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CBUF.DE vs. ISPA.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares MSCI World Health Care Sector ESG UCITS ETF USD Dist (CBUF.DE) and iShares STOXX Global Select Dividend 100 UCITS ETF (DE) (ISPA.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CBUF.DE achieves a -2.22% return, which is significantly lower than ISPA.DE's 13.48% return.


CBUF.DE

1D
2.74%
1M
3.91%
YTD
-2.22%
6M
-1.50%
1Y
7.40%
3Y*
0.62%
5Y*
4.66%
10Y*

ISPA.DE

1D
0.49%
1M
2.52%
YTD
13.48%
6M
15.47%
1Y
29.54%
3Y*
18.65%
5Y*
11.00%
10Y*
8.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CBUF.DE vs. ISPA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
CBUF.DE
iShares MSCI World Health Care Sector ESG UCITS ETF USD Dist
-2.22%2.56%0.75%0.33%2.09%30.42%2.79%11.42%
ISPA.DE
iShares STOXX Global Select Dividend 100 UCITS ETF (DE)
13.48%19.72%12.97%4.80%0.43%22.39%-9.12%3.53%

Correlation

The correlation between CBUF.DE and ISPA.DE is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2019

0.48

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CBUF.DE vs. ISPA.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CBUF.DE
CBUF.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
CBUF.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBUF.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBUF.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
CBUF.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBUF.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

ISPA.DE
ISPA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
ISPA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISPA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISPA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
ISPA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISPA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CBUF.DE vs. ISPA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World Health Care Sector ESG UCITS ETF USD Dist (CBUF.DE) and iShares STOXX Global Select Dividend 100 UCITS ETF (DE) (ISPA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CBUF.DEISPA.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.62

-0.51

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.68

8.10

-7.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.56

28.73

-27.17

CBUF.DE vs. ISPA.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CBUF.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.53, which is lower than the ISPA.DE Sharpe Ratio of 3.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CBUF.DE and ISPA.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CBUF.DEISPA.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

3.35

-2.83

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

0.91

-0.57

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.68

-0.24

Drawdowns

CBUF.DE vs. ISPA.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CBUF.DE drawdown since its inception was -25.94%, smaller than the maximum ISPA.DE drawdown of -38.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBUF.DE and ISPA.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CBUF.DEISPA.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.94%

-38.91%

+12.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.87%

-3.63%

-7.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.76%

-15.10%

-6.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.76%

-15.10%

-6.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.66%

-1.09%

-8.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.65%

-4.46%

-1.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.74%

1.03%

+3.71%

Volatility

CBUF.DE vs. ISPA.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI World Health Care Sector ESG UCITS ETF USD Dist (CBUF.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.98% compared to iShares STOXX Global Select Dividend 100 UCITS ETF (DE) (ISPA.DE) at 2.62%. This indicates that CBUF.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ISPA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CBUF.DEISPA.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.98%

2.62%

+2.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.70%

6.51%

+3.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.98%

8.77%

+5.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.60%

12.00%

+1.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.36%

14.79%

+0.57%

CBUF.DE vs. ISPA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

CBUF.DE has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than ISPA.DE's 0.46% expense ratio.


Dividends

CBUF.DE vs. ISPA.DE - Dividend Comparison

CBUF.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%, less than ISPA.DE's 3.75% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CBUF.DE
iShares MSCI World Health Care Sector ESG UCITS ETF USD Dist
1.08%1.06%1.02%1.16%1.09%1.05%1.27%0.10%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ISPA.DE
iShares STOXX Global Select Dividend 100 UCITS ETF (DE)
3.75%4.52%4.89%5.91%6.92%3.32%4.04%4.02%3.37%5.66%3.64%4.35%

Frequently Asked Questions


CBUF.DE and ISPA.DE have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CBUF.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CBUF.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for ISPA.DE.

CBUF.DE is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while ISPA.DE is Global Equities. CBUF.DE tracks MSCI World Health Care ESG Reduced Carbon Select 20 35 Capped, while ISPA.DE tracks STOXX® Global Select Dividend 100 index. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for CBUF.DE and 0.46% for ISPA.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CBUF.DE and ISPA.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer