CBUF.DE vs. EUNL.DE
CBUF.DE (iShares MSCI World Health Care Sector ESG UCITS ETF USD Dist) and EUNL.DE (iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - CBUF.DE is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the MSCI World Health Care ESG Reduced Carbon Select 20 35 Capped, while EUNL.DE is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI World Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CBUF.DE returned 4.66%/yr vs 12.89%/yr for EUNL.DE. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CBUF.DE charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for EUNL.DE.
Performance
CBUF.DE vs. EUNL.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CBUF.DE achieves a -2.22% return, which is significantly lower than EUNL.DE's 10.86% return.
CBUF.DE
- 1D
- 2.74%
- 1M
- 3.91%
- YTD
- -2.22%
- 6M
- -1.50%
- 1Y
- 7.40%
- 3Y*
- 0.62%
- 5Y*
- 4.66%
- 10Y*
- —
EUNL.DE
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 4.80%
- YTD
- 10.86%
- 6M
- 11.29%
- 1Y
- 23.80%
- 3Y*
- 17.55%
- 5Y*
- 12.89%
- 10Y*
- 12.82%
CBUF.DE vs. EUNL.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CBUF.DE iShares MSCI World Health Care Sector ESG UCITS ETF USD Dist | -2.22% | 2.56% | 0.75% | 0.33% | 2.09% | 30.42% | 2.79% | 11.42% |
EUNL.DE iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 10.86% | 7.90% | 25.93% | 20.13% | -13.59% | 32.71% | 5.48% | 6.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between CBUF.DE and EUNL.DE is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2019 | 0.67 |
Over the past year, the correlation between CBUF.DE and EUNL.DE has dropped to 0.38 - well below their long-term average of 0.67, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CBUF.DE vs. EUNL.DE — Risk / Return Rank
CBUF.DE
EUNL.DE
CBUF.DE vs. EUNL.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World Health Care Sector ESG UCITS ETF USD Dist (CBUF.DE) and iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EUNL.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CBUF.DE | EUNL.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.40 | -0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.68 | 3.64 | -2.97 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.56 | 14.52 | -12.96 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CBUF.DE | EUNL.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 | 2.12 | -1.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 | 0.90 | -0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.84 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.82 | -0.38 |
Drawdowns
CBUF.DE vs. EUNL.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CBUF.DE drawdown since its inception was -25.94%, smaller than the maximum EUNL.DE drawdown of -33.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBUF.DE and EUNL.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CBUF.DE | EUNL.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.94% | -33.63% | +7.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.87% | -6.50% | -4.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.76% | -21.73% | -0.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.76% | -21.73% | -0.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.63% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.66% | -0.31% | -9.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.65% | -4.25% | -1.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.74% | 1.64% | +3.10% |
Volatility
CBUF.DE vs. EUNL.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI World Health Care Sector ESG UCITS ETF USD Dist (CBUF.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.98% compared to iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EUNL.DE) at 2.62%. This indicates that CBUF.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EUNL.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CBUF.DE | EUNL.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.98% | 2.62% | +2.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.70% | 7.72% | +1.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.98% | 11.16% | +2.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.60% | 14.17% | -0.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.36% | 15.17% | +0.19% |
CBUF.DE vs. EUNL.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
CBUF.DE has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than EUNL.DE's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
CBUF.DE vs. EUNL.DE - Dividend Comparison
CBUF.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%, while EUNL.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CBUF.DE iShares MSCI World Health Care Sector ESG UCITS ETF USD Dist | 1.08% | 1.06% | 1.02% | 1.16% | 1.09% | 1.05% | 1.27% | 0.10% |
EUNL.DE iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CBUF.DE and EUNL.DE have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CBUF.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CBUF.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for EUNL.DE.
CBUF.DE is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while EUNL.DE is Global Equities. CBUF.DE tracks MSCI World Health Care ESG Reduced Carbon Select 20 35 Capped, while EUNL.DE tracks MSCI World Index. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for CBUF.DE and 0.20% for EUNL.DE.
Find the right allocation for CBUF.DE and EUNL.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer