CBUF.DE vs. DTLA.L
CBUF.DE (iShares MSCI World Health Care Sector ESG UCITS ETF USD Dist) and DTLA.L (iShares USD Treasury Bond 20+yr UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - CBUF.DE is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the MSCI World Health Care ESG Reduced Carbon Select 20 35 Capped, while DTLA.L is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE US Treasury 20+ Year Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CBUF.DE returned 4.66%/yr vs -5.19%/yr for DTLA.L. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CBUF.DE charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for DTLA.L.
Performance
CBUF.DE vs. DTLA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CBUF.DE is traded in EUR, while DTLA.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the DTLA.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CBUF.DE achieves a -2.22% return, which is significantly lower than DTLA.L's 0.15% return.
CBUF.DE
- 1D
- 2.74%
- 1M
- 3.91%
- YTD
- -2.22%
- 6M
- -1.50%
- 1Y
- 7.40%
- 3Y*
- 0.62%
- 5Y*
- 4.66%
- 10Y*
- —
DTLA.L
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- 1.38%
- YTD
- 0.15%
- 6M
- -0.83%
- 1Y
- 2.23%
- 3Y*
- -4.14%
- 5Y*
- -5.19%
- 10Y*
- —
CBUF.DE vs. DTLA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CBUF.DE iShares MSCI World Health Care Sector ESG UCITS ETF USD Dist | -2.22% | 2.56% | 0.75% | 0.33% | 2.09% | 30.42% | 2.79% | 11.42% |
DTLA.L iShares USD Treasury Bond 20+yr UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.15% | -7.92% | -0.83% | -1.36% | -25.97% | 2.68% | 7.36% | -2.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between CBUF.DE and DTLA.L is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2019 | 0.04 |
The correlation between CBUF.DE and DTLA.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.04 (all time) to 0.24 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CBUF.DE vs. DTLA.L — Risk / Return Rank
CBUF.DE
DTLA.L
CBUF.DE vs. DTLA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World Health Care Sector ESG UCITS ETF USD Dist (CBUF.DE) and iShares USD Treasury Bond 20+yr UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (DTLA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CBUF.DE | DTLA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.04 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.68 | 0.30 | +0.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.56 | 0.65 | +0.91 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CBUF.DE | DTLA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 | 0.23 | +0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 | -0.33 | +0.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | -0.05 | +0.49 |
Drawdowns
CBUF.DE vs. DTLA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CBUF.DE drawdown since its inception was -25.94%, smaller than the maximum DTLA.L drawdown of -46.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBUF.DE and DTLA.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CBUF.DE | DTLA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.94% | -46.98% | +21.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.87% | -7.32% | -3.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.76% | -18.24% | -3.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.76% | -39.80% | +18.04% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.66% | -43.54% | +33.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.65% | -24.85% | +19.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.74% | 3.42% | +1.32% |
Volatility
CBUF.DE vs. DTLA.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI World Health Care Sector ESG UCITS ETF USD Dist (CBUF.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.98% compared to iShares USD Treasury Bond 20+yr UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (DTLA.L) at 2.84%. This indicates that CBUF.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DTLA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CBUF.DE | DTLA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.98% | 2.84% | +2.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.70% | 6.89% | +2.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.98% | 9.90% | +4.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.60% | 15.49% | -1.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.36% | 15.56% | -0.20% |
CBUF.DE vs. DTLA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
CBUF.DE has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than DTLA.L's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
CBUF.DE vs. DTLA.L - Dividend Comparison
CBUF.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%, while DTLA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CBUF.DE iShares MSCI World Health Care Sector ESG UCITS ETF USD Dist | 1.08% | 1.06% | 1.02% | 1.16% | 1.09% | 1.05% | 1.27% | 0.10% |
DTLA.L iShares USD Treasury Bond 20+yr UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CBUF.DE and DTLA.L have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DTLA.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DTLA.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for CBUF.DE.
CBUF.DE is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while DTLA.L is Government Bonds. CBUF.DE tracks MSCI World Health Care ESG Reduced Carbon Select 20 35 Capped, while DTLA.L tracks ICE US Treasury 20+ Year Index. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for CBUF.DE and 0.07% for DTLA.L.
Find the right allocation for CBUF.DE and DTLA.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer