PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CBU7.L vs. TRES.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CBU7.L vs. TRES.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares $ Treasury Bond 3-7yr UCITS ETF USD Acc (CBU7.L) and Invesco US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF Dist (TRES.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CBU7.L achieves a -0.52% return, which is significantly lower than TRES.L's -0.30% return.


CBU7.L

1D
0.19%
1M
-0.13%
YTD
-0.52%
6M
-0.10%
1Y
3.16%
3Y*
3.73%
5Y*
0.39%
10Y*
1.39%

TRES.L

1D
0.18%
1M
0.17%
YTD
-0.30%
6M
0.09%
1Y
3.62%
3Y*
2.90%
5Y*
-0.37%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CBU7.L vs. TRES.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
CBU7.L
iShares $ Treasury Bond 3-7yr UCITS ETF USD Acc
-0.52%7.34%2.16%4.26%-9.35%-2.35%6.98%4.85%
TRES.L
Invesco US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF Dist
-0.30%6.57%0.75%3.82%-12.15%-2.44%8.00%5.79%

Correlation

The correlation between CBU7.L and TRES.L is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2019

0.78

The correlation between CBU7.L and TRES.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CBU7.L vs. TRES.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CBU7.L
CBU7.L Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
CBU7.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBU7.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBU7.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
CBU7.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBU7.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

TRES.L
TRES.L Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
TRES.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRES.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRES.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
TRES.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRES.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CBU7.L vs. TRES.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares $ Treasury Bond 3-7yr UCITS ETF USD Acc (CBU7.L) and Invesco US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF Dist (TRES.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CBU7.LTRES.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.16

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.26

1.23

+0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.06

3.84

+0.22

CBU7.L vs. TRES.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CBU7.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.07, which is comparable to the TRES.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CBU7.L and TRES.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CBU7.LTRES.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.07

0.89

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

-0.07

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.23

+0.35

Drawdowns

CBU7.L vs. TRES.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CBU7.L drawdown since its inception was -14.18%, smaller than the maximum TRES.L drawdown of -18.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBU7.L and TRES.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CBU7.LTRES.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.18%

-18.77%

+4.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.50%

-2.93%

+0.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.66%

-5.16%

+1.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.55%

-16.40%

+2.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.60%

-6.77%

+5.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.33%

-8.61%

+5.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.77%

0.94%

-0.17%

Volatility

CBU7.L vs. TRES.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares $ Treasury Bond 3-7yr UCITS ETF USD Acc (CBU7.L) is 1.13%, while Invesco US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF Dist (TRES.L) has a volatility of 1.36%. This indicates that CBU7.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TRES.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CBU7.LTRES.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.13%

1.36%

-0.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.15%

2.75%

-0.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.96%

4.08%

-1.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.70%

5.73%

-1.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.10%

5.67%

-1.57%

CBU7.L vs. TRES.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

CBU7.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than TRES.L's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

CBU7.L vs. TRES.L - Dividend Comparison

CBU7.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TRES.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.25%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
CBU7.L
iShares $ Treasury Bond 3-7yr UCITS ETF USD Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TRES.L
Invesco US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF Dist
4.25%4.19%4.26%3.78%1.96%1.14%1.58%1.96%

Frequently Asked Questions


CBU7.L and TRES.L have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TRES.L is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TRES.L is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for CBU7.L.

CBU7.L tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 3-7 Year Bond Index, while TRES.L tracks Bloomberg US Treasury Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for CBU7.L and 0.06% for TRES.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CBU7.L and TRES.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer