PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CBU0.DE vs. VX6F.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CBU0.DE vs. VX6F.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Core GBP Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (CBU0.DE) and Vanguard U.K. Gilt UCITS ETF GBP Accumulation (VX6F.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CBU0.DE achieves a -0.89% return, which is significantly lower than VX6F.DE's -0.49% return.


CBU0.DE

1D
0.17%
1M
1.62%
YTD
-0.89%
6M
-0.90%
1Y
2.46%
3Y*
3.94%
5Y*
10Y*

VX6F.DE

1D
0.16%
1M
1.29%
YTD
-0.49%
6M
-0.45%
1Y
-0.62%
3Y*
2.12%
5Y*
-2.47%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CBU0.DE vs. VX6F.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
CBU0.DE
iShares Core GBP Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc
-0.89%4.58%-0.25%5.06%
VX6F.DE
Vanguard U.K. Gilt UCITS ETF GBP Accumulation
-0.49%0.53%-0.19%0.71%

Correlation

The correlation between CBU0.DE and VX6F.DE is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2023

0.82

The correlation between CBU0.DE and VX6F.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CBU0.DE vs. VX6F.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CBU0.DE
CBU0.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
CBU0.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBU0.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBU0.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
CBU0.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBU0.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

VX6F.DE
VX6F.DE Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
VX6F.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VX6F.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
VX6F.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
VX6F.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
VX6F.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CBU0.DE vs. VX6F.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core GBP Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (CBU0.DE) and Vanguard U.K. Gilt UCITS ETF GBP Accumulation (VX6F.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CBU0.DEVX6F.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

0.99

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.58

-0.12

+0.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.62

-0.27

+1.88

CBU0.DE vs. VX6F.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CBU0.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.48, which is higher than the VX6F.DE Sharpe Ratio of -0.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CBU0.DE and VX6F.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CBU0.DEVX6F.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

-0.08

+0.56

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

-0.06

+0.51

Drawdowns

CBU0.DE vs. VX6F.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CBU0.DE drawdown since its inception was -6.02%, smaller than the maximum VX6F.DE drawdown of -38.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBU0.DE and VX6F.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CBU0.DEVX6F.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.02%

-38.93%

+32.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.20%

-5.35%

+1.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.20%

-9.02%

+4.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.03%

-19.85%

+17.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.65%

-14.82%

+13.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.52%

2.34%

-0.82%

Volatility

CBU0.DE vs. VX6F.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core GBP Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (CBU0.DE) is 2.00%, while Vanguard U.K. Gilt UCITS ETF GBP Accumulation (VX6F.DE) has a volatility of 3.41%. This indicates that CBU0.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VX6F.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CBU0.DEVX6F.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.00%

3.41%

-1.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.39%

6.21%

-1.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.11%

8.03%

-2.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.81%

12.92%

-7.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.81%

12.09%

-6.28%

CBU0.DE vs. VX6F.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

CBU0.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than VX6F.DE's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

CBU0.DE vs. VX6F.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither CBU0.DE nor VX6F.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


CBU0.DE and VX6F.DE have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VX6F.DE is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VX6F.DE is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for CBU0.DE.

CBU0.DE is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while VX6F.DE is Government Bonds. CBU0.DE tracks iBoxx® GBP Liquid Corporates Large Cap (EUR Hedged), while VX6F.DE tracks Bloomberg Sterling Gilt Float Adjusted Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for CBU0.DE and 0.05% for VX6F.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CBU0.DE and VX6F.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer