PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CBU0.DE vs. PR1P.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CBU0.DE vs. PR1P.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Core GBP Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (CBU0.DE) and Amundi Prime US Corporates UCITS ETF DR (D) (PR1P.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CBU0.DE achieves a -0.89% return, which is significantly lower than PR1P.DE's 1.50% return.


CBU0.DE

1D
0.17%
1M
0.91%
YTD
-0.89%
6M
-0.71%
1Y
2.45%
3Y*
3.94%
5Y*
10Y*

PR1P.DE

1D
0.19%
1M
1.14%
YTD
1.50%
6M
0.65%
1Y
4.13%
3Y*
2.36%
5Y*
1.40%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CBU0.DE vs. PR1P.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
CBU0.DE
iShares Core GBP Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc
-0.89%4.58%-0.25%5.06%
PR1P.DE
Amundi Prime US Corporates UCITS ETF DR (D)
1.50%-3.91%7.65%1.77%

Correlation

The correlation between CBU0.DE and PR1P.DE is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2023

0.41

The correlation between CBU0.DE and PR1P.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (1 year) to 0.41 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CBU0.DE vs. PR1P.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CBU0.DE
CBU0.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
CBU0.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBU0.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBU0.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
CBU0.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBU0.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

PR1P.DE
PR1P.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
PR1P.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PR1P.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
PR1P.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
PR1P.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
PR1P.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CBU0.DE vs. PR1P.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core GBP Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (CBU0.DE) and Amundi Prime US Corporates UCITS ETF DR (D) (PR1P.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CBU0.DEPR1P.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.11

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.58

1.03

-0.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.62

2.57

-0.96

CBU0.DE vs. PR1P.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CBU0.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.48, which is comparable to the PR1P.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CBU0.DE and PR1P.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CBU0.DEPR1P.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

0.60

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.08

+0.37

Drawdowns

CBU0.DE vs. PR1P.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CBU0.DE drawdown since its inception was -6.02%, smaller than the maximum PR1P.DE drawdown of -14.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBU0.DE and PR1P.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CBU0.DEPR1P.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.02%

-14.46%

+8.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.20%

-3.57%

-0.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.20%

-11.79%

+7.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.03%

-5.24%

+3.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.65%

-5.81%

+4.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.52%

1.43%

+0.09%

Volatility

CBU0.DE vs. PR1P.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core GBP Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (CBU0.DE) has a higher volatility of 2.00% compared to Amundi Prime US Corporates UCITS ETF DR (D) (PR1P.DE) at 1.24%. This indicates that CBU0.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PR1P.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CBU0.DEPR1P.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.00%

1.24%

+0.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.39%

4.24%

+0.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.11%

6.10%

-0.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.81%

8.34%

-2.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.81%

9.27%

-3.46%

CBU0.DE vs. PR1P.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

CBU0.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than PR1P.DE's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

CBU0.DE vs. PR1P.DE - Dividend Comparison

CBU0.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PR1P.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.67%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
CBU0.DE
iShares Core GBP Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PR1P.DE
Amundi Prime US Corporates UCITS ETF DR (D)
4.67%4.74%4.35%4.15%4.21%3.32%3.35%

Frequently Asked Questions


CBU0.DE and PR1P.DE have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PR1P.DE is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PR1P.DE is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for CBU0.DE.

CBU0.DE tracks iBoxx® GBP Liquid Corporates Large Cap (EUR Hedged), while PR1P.DE tracks Solactive USD Investment Grade Corporate. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for CBU0.DE and 0.05% for PR1P.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CBU0.DE and PR1P.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer