PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CBU0.DE vs. IS3F.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CBU0.DE vs. IS3F.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Core GBP Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (CBU0.DE) and iShares $ Corp Bond Interest Rate Hedged UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IS3F.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CBU0.DE achieves a -1.09% return, which is significantly lower than IS3F.DE's 5.22% return.


CBU0.DE

1D
-0.37%
1M
-0.73%
6M
-2.16%
YTD
-1.09%
1Y
1.69%
3Y*
4.05%
5Y*
10Y*

IS3F.DE

1D
0.24%
1M
0.98%
6M
3.95%
YTD
5.22%
1Y
6.48%
3Y*
6.79%
5Y*
6.06%
10Y*
4.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CBU0.DE vs. IS3F.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
CBU0.DE
iShares Core GBP Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc
-1.09%4.57%-0.38%4.77%
IS3F.DE
iShares $ Corp Bond Interest Rate Hedged UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
5.22%-6.28%14.29%8.85%

Correlation

The correlation between CBU0.DE and IS3F.DE is -0.28, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 24, 2023

-0.21

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CBU0.DE vs. IS3F.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CBU0.DE
CBU0.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
CBU0.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBU0.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBU0.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
CBU0.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBU0.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

IS3F.DE
IS3F.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
IS3F.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IS3F.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
IS3F.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
IS3F.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
IS3F.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CBU0.DE vs. IS3F.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core GBP Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (CBU0.DE) and iShares $ Corp Bond Interest Rate Hedged UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IS3F.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CBU0.DEIS3F.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.18

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.39

2.20

-1.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.03

5.63

-4.60

CBU0.DE vs. IS3F.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CBU0.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.31, which is lower than the IS3F.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CBU0.DE and IS3F.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CBU0.DE vs. IS3F.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CBU0.DE drawdown since its inception was -6.16%, smaller than the maximum IS3F.DE drawdown of -27.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBU0.DE and IS3F.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CBU0.DEIS3F.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.16%

-27.25%

+21.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.32%

-2.93%

-1.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.32%

-11.67%

+7.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.34%

-3.64%

+1.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.67%

-8.17%

+6.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.63%

1.15%

+0.48%

Volatility

CBU0.DE vs. IS3F.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core GBP Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (CBU0.DE) is 1.52%, while iShares $ Corp Bond Interest Rate Hedged UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IS3F.DE) has a volatility of 1.99%. This indicates that CBU0.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IS3F.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CBU0.DEIS3F.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.52%

1.99%

-0.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.71%

4.57%

+0.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.36%

6.42%

-1.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.90%

7.67%

-1.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.90%

8.21%

-2.31%

CBU0.DE vs. IS3F.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both CBU0.DE and IS3F.DE have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

CBU0.DE vs. IS3F.DE - Dividend Comparison

CBU0.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IS3F.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.26%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CBU0.DE
iShares Core GBP Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IS3F.DE
iShares $ Corp Bond Interest Rate Hedged UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
4.26%4.77%5.36%4.95%2.10%1.50%2.62%3.52%2.81%2.25%2.36%3.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


CBU0.DE and IS3F.DE have a correlation of -0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CBU0.DE and IS3F.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.

CBU0.DE tracks iBoxx® GBP Liquid Corporates Large Cap (EUR Hedged), while IS3F.DE tracks Markit iBoxx USD Liquid Investment Grade Interest Rate Hedged Index.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CBU0.DE and IS3F.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer