CBU0.DE vs. EUNA.DE
CBU0.DE (iShares Core GBP Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc) and EUNA.DE (iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - CBU0.DE is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the iBoxx® GBP Liquid Corporates Large Cap (EUR Hedged), while EUNA.DE is a Global Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond (EUR Hedged). Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CBU0.DE returned 3.94%/yr vs 2.28%/yr for EUNA.DE. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CBU0.DE charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for EUNA.DE.
Performance
CBU0.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CBU0.DE achieves a -0.89% return, which is significantly lower than EUNA.DE's -0.46% return.
CBU0.DE
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- 0.91%
- YTD
- -0.89%
- 6M
- -0.71%
- 1Y
- 2.45%
- 3Y*
- 3.94%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EUNA.DE
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- -0.12%
- YTD
- -0.46%
- 6M
- -0.07%
- 1Y
- 1.32%
- 3Y*
- 2.28%
- 5Y*
- -1.29%
- 10Y*
- —
CBU0.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CBU0.DE iShares Core GBP Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc | -0.89% | 4.58% | -0.25% | 5.06% |
EUNA.DE iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc | -0.46% | 2.79% | 1.60% | 1.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between CBU0.DE and EUNA.DE is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2023 | 0.76 |
The correlation between CBU0.DE and EUNA.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CBU0.DE vs. EUNA.DE — Risk / Return Rank
CBU0.DE
EUNA.DE
CBU0.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core GBP Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (CBU0.DE) and iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (EUNA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CBU0.DE | EUNA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.06 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.58 | 0.43 | +0.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.62 | 1.18 | +0.43 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CBU0.DE | EUNA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 | 0.34 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.28 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | -0.05 | +0.50 |
Drawdowns
CBU0.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CBU0.DE drawdown since its inception was -6.02%, smaller than the maximum EUNA.DE drawdown of -17.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBU0.DE and EUNA.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CBU0.DE | EUNA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.02% | -17.79% | +11.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.20% | -2.75% | -1.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.20% | -4.02% | -0.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -17.03% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.03% | -8.66% | +6.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.65% | -6.76% | +5.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.52% | 0.99% | +0.53% |
Volatility
CBU0.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core GBP Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (CBU0.DE) has a higher volatility of 2.00% compared to iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (EUNA.DE) at 1.35%. This indicates that CBU0.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EUNA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CBU0.DE | EUNA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.00% | 1.35% | +0.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.39% | 2.82% | +1.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.11% | 3.46% | +1.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.81% | 4.64% | +1.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.81% | 4.27% | +1.54% |
CBU0.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
CBU0.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than EUNA.DE's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
CBU0.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither CBU0.DE nor EUNA.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CBU0.DE and EUNA.DE have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EUNA.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EUNA.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for CBU0.DE.
CBU0.DE is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while EUNA.DE is Global Bonds. CBU0.DE tracks iBoxx® GBP Liquid Corporates Large Cap (EUR Hedged), while EUNA.DE tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond (EUR Hedged). Their fees differ too: 0.25% for CBU0.DE and 0.10% for EUNA.DE.
Find the right allocation for CBU0.DE and EUNA.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer