PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CBU0.DE vs. 2B7S.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CBU0.DE vs. 2B7S.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Core GBP Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (CBU0.DE) and iShares $ Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Acc (2B7S.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CBU0.DE achieves a -0.89% return, which is significantly lower than 2B7S.DE's -0.08% return.


CBU0.DE

1D
0.17%
1M
1.62%
YTD
-0.89%
6M
-0.90%
1Y
2.46%
3Y*
3.94%
5Y*
10Y*

2B7S.DE

1D
0.09%
1M
-0.02%
YTD
-0.08%
6M
-0.01%
1Y
1.30%
3Y*
2.30%
5Y*
-0.00%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CBU0.DE vs. 2B7S.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
CBU0.DE
iShares Core GBP Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc
-0.89%4.58%-0.25%5.06%
2B7S.DE
iShares $ Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Acc
-0.08%2.92%2.36%0.59%

Correlation

The correlation between CBU0.DE and 2B7S.DE is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2023

0.53

The correlation between CBU0.DE and 2B7S.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.46 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CBU0.DE vs. 2B7S.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CBU0.DE
CBU0.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
CBU0.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBU0.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBU0.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
CBU0.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBU0.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

2B7S.DE
2B7S.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
2B7S.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
2B7S.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
2B7S.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
2B7S.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
2B7S.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CBU0.DE vs. 2B7S.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core GBP Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (CBU0.DE) and iShares $ Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Acc (2B7S.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CBU0.DE2B7S.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.18

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.58

1.51

-0.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.62

4.17

-2.56

CBU0.DE vs. 2B7S.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CBU0.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.48, which is lower than the 2B7S.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CBU0.DE and 2B7S.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CBU0.DE2B7S.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

1.00

-0.52

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

-0.00

+0.45

Drawdowns

CBU0.DE vs. 2B7S.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CBU0.DE drawdown since its inception was -6.02%, smaller than the maximum 2B7S.DE drawdown of -7.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBU0.DE and 2B7S.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CBU0.DE2B7S.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.02%

-7.76%

+1.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.20%

-0.85%

-3.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.20%

-1.14%

-3.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-7.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.03%

-0.58%

-1.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.65%

-3.30%

+1.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.52%

0.31%

+1.21%

Volatility

CBU0.DE vs. 2B7S.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core GBP Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (CBU0.DE) has a higher volatility of 2.00% compared to iShares $ Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Acc (2B7S.DE) at 0.47%. This indicates that CBU0.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 2B7S.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CBU0.DE2B7S.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.00%

0.47%

+1.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.39%

0.92%

+3.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.11%

1.29%

+3.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.81%

1.99%

+3.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.81%

1.96%

+3.85%

CBU0.DE vs. 2B7S.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

CBU0.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than 2B7S.DE's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

CBU0.DE vs. 2B7S.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither CBU0.DE nor 2B7S.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


CBU0.DE and 2B7S.DE have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, 2B7S.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

2B7S.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for CBU0.DE.

CBU0.DE is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while 2B7S.DE is Government Bonds. CBU0.DE tracks iBoxx® GBP Liquid Corporates Large Cap (EUR Hedged), while 2B7S.DE tracks ICE US Treasury 1-3 Year (EUR Hedged) Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for CBU0.DE and 0.10% for 2B7S.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CBU0.DE and 2B7S.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer