PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CBTL vs. OCTB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CBTL vs. OCTB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos Laddered Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF (CBTL) and Aptus October Buffer ETF (OCTB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CBTL achieves a -14.75% return, which is significantly lower than OCTB's 6.18% return.


CBTL

1D
-0.65%
1M
-6.10%
YTD
-14.75%
6M
-18.34%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

OCTB

1D
-0.17%
1M
2.41%
YTD
6.18%
6M
6.75%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CBTL vs. OCTB - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CBTL and OCTB is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 15, 2025

0.50

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CBTL vs. OCTB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Laddered Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF (CBTL) and Aptus October Buffer ETF (OCTB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CBTL vs. OCTB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CBTLOCTBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-1.76

1.97

-3.73

Drawdowns

CBTL vs. OCTB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CBTL drawdown since its inception was -27.80%, which is greater than OCTB's maximum drawdown of -4.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBTL and OCTB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CBTLOCTBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.80%

-4.79%

-23.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-27.80%

-0.17%

-27.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.27%

-0.70%

-17.57%

Volatility

CBTL vs. OCTB - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CBTLOCTBDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.41%

7.20%

+15.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.41%

7.20%

+15.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.41%

7.20%

+15.21%

CBTL vs. OCTB - Expense Ratio Comparison

CBTL has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than OCTB's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

CBTL vs. OCTB - Dividend Comparison

CBTL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.15%, while OCTB has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


CBTL and OCTB have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, OCTB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

OCTB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for CBTL.

CBTL has the higher dividend yield at 1.15%, compared with 0.00% for OCTB.

They also come from different issuers: Calamos and Aptus Capital Advisors. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for CBTL and 0.25% for OCTB.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CBTL and OCTB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer