CBTJ vs. CAIQ
CBTJ (Calamos Bitcoin 80 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - January) and CAIQ (Calamos Nasdaq Autocallable Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CBTJ is a Blockchain fund actively managed by Calamos, while CAIQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the MerQube Nasdaq-100 Vol Advantage Autocallable Index. CBTJ is actively managed, while CAIQ is passively managed. Their 0.41 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. CBTJ charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for CAIQ.
Performance
CBTJ vs. CAIQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CBTJ achieves a -19.11% return, which is significantly lower than CAIQ's 12.29% return.
CBTJ
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- 0.52%
- 6M
- -10.11%
- YTD
- -19.11%
- 1Y
- -36.69%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -19.93%
CAIQ
- 1D
- 2.09%
- 1M
- 0.55%
- 6M
- 12.58%
- YTD
- 12.29%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $5.68M | $5.62M | $5.21M | |
| $73.35K | $163.83K | $333.67K |
CBTJ vs. CAIQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CBTJ Calamos Bitcoin 80 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - January | -19.11% | -5.74% |
CAIQ Calamos Nasdaq Autocallable Income ETF | 12.29% | 4.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between CBTJ and CAIQ is 0.41, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2025 | 0.41 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CBTJ vs. CAIQ — Risk / Return Rank
CBTJ
CAIQ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
CBTJ vs. CAIQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Bitcoin 80 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - January (CBTJ) and Calamos Nasdaq Autocallable Income ETF (CAIQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CBTJ | CAIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.77 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.87 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.27 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CBTJ vs. CAIQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CBTJ drawdown since its inception was -42.41%, which is greater than CAIQ's maximum drawdown of -9.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBTJ and CAIQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CBTJ | CAIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.41% | -9.06% | -33.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -42.41% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -40.96% | -1.11% | -39.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.94% | -1.84% | -16.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 28.86% | — | — |
Volatility
CBTJ vs. CAIQ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CBTJ | CAIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.63% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.52% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.56% | 13.69% | +12.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.64% | 13.69% | +10.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.64% | 13.69% | +10.95% |
CBTJ vs. CAIQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
CBTJ has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than CAIQ's 0.74% expense ratio.
Dividends
CBTJ vs. CAIQ - Dividend Comparison
CBTJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.79%, less than CAIQ's 11.73% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
CAIQ Calamos Nasdaq Autocallable Income ETF | 11.73% | 1.54% |
CBTJ Calamos Bitcoin 80 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - January | 1.79% | 1.45% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CBTJ and CAIQ have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CBTJ is cheaper at 0.69% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CBTJ is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for CAIQ.
CAIQ has the higher dividend yield at 11.73%, compared with 1.79% for CBTJ.
CBTJ is categorized as Blockchain, while CAIQ is Nasdaq-100. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for CBTJ and 0.74% for CAIQ.
Find the right allocation for CBTJ and CAIQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer