CBTA vs. PBFR
CBTA (Calamos Bitcoin 80 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - April) and PBFR (PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. CBTA is passively managed, while PBFR is actively managed. Over the past year, CBTA returned -33.12% vs 11.38% for PBFR. Their 0.43 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. CBTA charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for PBFR.
Performance
CBTA vs. PBFR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CBTA achieves a -24.45% return, which is significantly lower than PBFR's 5.89% return.
CBTA
- 1D
- 0.83%
- 1M
- 2.26%
- 6M
- -16.28%
- YTD
- -24.45%
- 1Y
- -33.12%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -11.98%
PBFR
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- 1.01%
- 6M
- 5.06%
- YTD
- 5.89%
- 1Y
- 11.38%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 10.34%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $19.28K | $37.33K | $32.42K | |
| $1.32M | $1.10M | $1.64M |
CBTA vs. PBFR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CBTA Calamos Bitcoin 80 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - April | -24.45% | 11.82% |
PBFR PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF | 5.89% | 17.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between CBTA and PBFR is 0.43, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2025 | 0.43 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CBTA vs. PBFR — Risk / Return Rank
CBTA
PBFR
CBTA vs. PBFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Bitcoin 80 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - April (CBTA) and PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF (PBFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CBTA | PBFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.81 | 1.55 | -0.73 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.83 | 4.06 | -4.89 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.32 | 20.65 | -21.97 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CBTA vs. PBFR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CBTA drawdown since its inception was -39.83%, which is greater than PBFR's maximum drawdown of -8.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBTA and PBFR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CBTA | PBFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.83% | -8.50% | -31.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -39.83% | -2.82% | -37.01% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -36.91% | 0.00% | -36.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.96% | -0.61% | -15.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 25.05% | 0.55% | +24.50% |
Volatility
CBTA vs. PBFR - Volatility Comparison
Calamos Bitcoin 80 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - April (CBTA) has a higher volatility of 4.88% compared to PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF (PBFR) at 1.33%. This indicates that CBTA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PBFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CBTA | PBFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.88% | 1.33% | +3.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.40% | 3.65% | +17.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.44% | 4.41% | +25.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.78% | 6.74% | +20.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.78% | 6.74% | +20.04% |
CBTA vs. PBFR - Expense Ratio Comparison
CBTA has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than PBFR's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
CBTA vs. PBFR - Dividend Comparison
CBTA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, more than PBFR's 0.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
CBTA Calamos Bitcoin 80 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - April | 1.18% | 0.89% | 0.00% |
PBFR PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CBTA and PBFR have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CBTA has higher volatility (4.88%) compared to PBFR (1.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CBTA dropped -39.83% vs PBFR's -8.50%.
On 1-year performance, PBFR leads with 11.38% vs -33.12% for CBTA. On fees, PBFR is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, PBFR has been the lower-risk option at 1.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, PBFR has performed better with a 11.38% return vs -33.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PBFR is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for CBTA.
CBTA has the higher dividend yield at 1.18%, compared with 0.01% for PBFR.
They also come from different issuers: Calamos and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for CBTA and 0.50% for PBFR.
PBFR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.60 vs -1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CBTA and PBFR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer