PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CBTA vs. DBE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CBTA vs. DBE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos Bitcoin 80 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - April (CBTA) and Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CBTA achieves a -23.99% return, which is significantly lower than DBE's 63.53% return.


CBTA

1D
0.43%
1M
1.07%
6M
-11.46%
YTD
-23.99%
1Y
-33.22%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-11.52%

DBE

1D
-0.24%
1M
9.43%
6M
46.31%
YTD
63.53%
1Y
57.60%
3Y*
13.46%
5Y*
16.54%
10Y*
11.73%
ALL TIME*
2.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$19.36K$35.38K$32.18K
$1.42M$1.12M$1.57M

CBTA vs. DBE - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CBTA and DBE is -0.09, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2025

-0.06

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CBTA vs. DBE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CBTA
CBTA Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
CBTA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBTA Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBTA Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
CBTA Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBTA Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

DBE
DBE Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
DBE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBE Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
DBE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBE Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CBTA vs. DBE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Bitcoin 80 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - April (CBTA) and Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CBTADBEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.81

1.26

-0.45

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.84

2.34

-3.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.32

7.22

-8.54

CBTA vs. DBE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CBTA Sharpe Ratio is -1.13, which is lower than the DBE Sharpe Ratio of 1.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CBTA and DBE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CBTA vs. DBE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CBTA drawdown since its inception was -39.83%, smaller than the maximum DBE drawdown of -86.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBTA and DBE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CBTADBEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.83%

-86.69%

+46.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-39.83%

-24.72%

-15.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-60.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-36.52%

-37.92%

+1.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.09%

-57.12%

+41.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

25.26%

8.00%

+17.26%

Volatility

CBTA vs. DBE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Calamos Bitcoin 80 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - April (CBTA) is 4.56%, while Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE) has a volatility of 15.65%. This indicates that CBTA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CBTADBEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.56%

15.65%

-11.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.43%

33.76%

-13.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.37%

37.85%

-8.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.71%

30.19%

-3.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.71%

28.63%

-1.92%

CBTA vs. DBE - Expense Ratio Comparison

CBTA has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than DBE's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

CBTA vs. DBE - Dividend Comparison

CBTA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, less than DBE's 2.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
CBTA
Calamos Bitcoin 80 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - April
1.18%0.89%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
DBE
Invesco DB Energy Fund
2.36%3.86%6.32%3.87%0.75%0.00%0.00%1.79%1.67%

Frequently Asked Questions


CBTA and DBE have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DBE has higher volatility (15.65%) compared to CBTA (4.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CBTA dropped -39.83% vs DBE's -86.69%.

On 1-year performance, DBE leads with 57.60% vs -33.22% for CBTA. On fees, CBTA is cheaper at 0.69% per year. On volatility, CBTA has been the lower-risk option at 4.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DBE has performed better with a 57.60% return vs -33.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CBTA is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for DBE.

DBE has the higher dividend yield at 2.36%, compared with 1.18% for CBTA.

CBTA is categorized as Defined Outcome, while DBE is Oil & Gas. CBTA tracks CBOE Bitcoin US ETF Index, while DBE tracks DBIQ Optimum Yield Energy Index. They also come from different issuers: Calamos and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for CBTA and 0.78% for DBE.

DBE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.53 vs -1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CBTA and DBE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer