CBTA vs. CAIE
CBTA (Calamos Bitcoin 80 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - April) and CAIE (Calamos Autocallable Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CBTA is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the CBOE Bitcoin US ETF Index, while CAIE is a Derivative Income fund tracking the MerQube US Large Cap Vol Advantage Autocallable Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CBTA charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for CAIE.
Performance
CBTA vs. CAIE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CBTA achieves a -23.76% return, which is significantly lower than CAIE's 9.06% return.
CBTA
- 1D
- -1.31%
- 1M
- -9.26%
- YTD
- -23.76%
- 6M
- -26.89%
- 1Y
- -28.38%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CAIE
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- 3.61%
- YTD
- 9.06%
- 6M
- 9.11%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CBTA vs. CAIE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CBTA Calamos Bitcoin 80 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - April | -23.76% | -8.36% |
CAIE Calamos Autocallable Income ETF | 9.06% | 15.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between CBTA and CAIE is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025 | 0.42 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CBTA vs. CAIE — Risk / Return Rank
CBTA
CAIE
CBTA vs. CAIE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Bitcoin 80 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - April (CBTA) and Calamos Autocallable Income ETF (CAIE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CBTA | CAIE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.84 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.78 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.42 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CBTA | CAIE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.98 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.47 | 2.31 | -2.78 |
Drawdowns
CBTA vs. CAIE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CBTA drawdown since its inception was -36.74%, which is greater than CAIE's maximum drawdown of -7.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBTA and CAIE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CBTA | CAIE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.74% | -7.73% | -29.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.74% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -36.33% | -0.40% | -35.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.99% | -1.06% | -11.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 20.01% | — | — |
Volatility
CBTA vs. CAIE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CBTA | CAIE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.51% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.83% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.99% | 11.93% | +17.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.68% | 11.93% | +15.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.68% | 11.93% | +15.75% |
CBTA vs. CAIE - Expense Ratio Comparison
CBTA has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than CAIE's 0.74% expense ratio.
Dividends
CBTA vs. CAIE - Dividend Comparison
CBTA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.17%, less than CAIE's 13.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
CAIE Calamos Autocallable Income ETF | 13.09% | 7.46% |
CBTA Calamos Bitcoin 80 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - April | 1.17% | 0.89% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CBTA and CAIE have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CBTA is cheaper at 0.69% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CBTA is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for CAIE.
CAIE has the higher dividend yield at 13.09%, compared with 1.17% for CBTA.
CBTA is categorized as Defined Outcome, while CAIE is Derivative Income. CBTA tracks CBOE Bitcoin US ETF Index, while CAIE tracks MerQube US Large Cap Vol Advantage Autocallable Index. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for CBTA and 0.74% for CAIE.
Find the right allocation for CBTA and CAIE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer