PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CBS5.L vs. ERNE.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CBS5.L vs. ERNE.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg MSCI US Liquid Corporates 1-5 Year Sustainable UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (CBS5.L) and iShares € Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (ERNE.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CBS5.L is traded in GBp, while ERNE.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the ERNE.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CBS5.L achieves a 0.23% return, which is significantly higher than ERNE.L's -1.36% return.


CBS5.L

1D
0.04%
1M
-0.74%
6M
-0.15%
YTD
0.23%
1Y
2.97%
3Y*
4.18%
5Y*
10Y*

ERNE.L

1D
0.09%
1M
-1.57%
6M
-0.93%
YTD
-1.36%
1Y
0.46%
3Y*
2.82%
5Y*
1.98%
10Y*
1.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CBS5.L vs. ERNE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
CBS5.L
UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg MSCI US Liquid Corporates 1-5 Year Sustainable UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc
0.23%-0.23%6.03%0.27%-17.89%
ERNE.L
iShares € Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)
-1.36%8.08%-0.59%1.32%5.17%

Correlation

The correlation between CBS5.L and ERNE.L is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 25, 2022

0.33

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CBS5.L vs. ERNE.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CBS5.L
CBS5.L Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
CBS5.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBS5.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBS5.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
CBS5.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBS5.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

ERNE.L
ERNE.L Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
ERNE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ERNE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
ERNE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
ERNE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
ERNE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CBS5.L vs. ERNE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg MSCI US Liquid Corporates 1-5 Year Sustainable UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (CBS5.L) and iShares € Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (ERNE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CBS5.LERNE.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.02

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.80

0.16

+0.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.01

0.43

+1.58

CBS5.L vs. ERNE.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CBS5.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.60, which is higher than the ERNE.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CBS5.L and ERNE.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CBS5.L vs. ERNE.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CBS5.L drawdown since its inception was -23.09%, which is greater than ERNE.L's maximum drawdown of -18.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBS5.L and ERNE.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CBS5.LERNE.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.09%

-18.38%

-4.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.35%

-2.76%

-1.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.03%

-3.01%

-5.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-4.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-11.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.95%

-2.41%

-10.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.14%

-5.90%

-10.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.74%

1.05%

+0.69%

Volatility

CBS5.L vs. ERNE.L - Volatility Comparison

UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg MSCI US Liquid Corporates 1-5 Year Sustainable UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (CBS5.L) has a higher volatility of 1.68% compared to iShares € Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (ERNE.L) at 1.08%. This indicates that CBS5.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ERNE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CBS5.LERNE.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.68%

1.08%

+0.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.27%

2.58%

+1.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.78%

3.90%

+1.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.42%

5.37%

+7.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.42%

6.65%

+5.77%

CBS5.L vs. ERNE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

CBS5.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than ERNE.L's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

CBS5.L vs. ERNE.L - Dividend Comparison

CBS5.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ERNE.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.33%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CBS5.L
UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg MSCI US Liquid Corporates 1-5 Year Sustainable UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ERNE.L
iShares € Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)
2.33%2.74%3.80%2.17%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.03%0.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


CBS5.L and ERNE.L have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ERNE.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ERNE.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for CBS5.L.

CBS5.L is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while ERNE.L is Ultrashort Bond. CBS5.L tracks Bloomberg US Corp Bond TR USD, while ERNE.L tracks Markit iBoxx EUR Liquid Investment Grade Ultrashort Index (EUR). They also come from different issuers: UBS and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for CBS5.L and 0.09% for ERNE.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CBS5.L and ERNE.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer