PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ERNE.L vs. FLOS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ERNE.L vs. FLOS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares € Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (ERNE.L) and iShares $ Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (FLOS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ERNE.L is traded in EUR, while FLOS.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the FLOS.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ERNE.L achieves a 1.18% return, which is significantly lower than FLOS.L's 5.38% return.


ERNE.L

1D
0.00%
1M
0.22%
6M
1.10%
YTD
1.18%
1Y
2.20%
3Y*
3.28%
5Y*
2.16%
10Y*
1.04%

FLOS.L

1D
0.00%
1M
2.22%
6M
4.44%
YTD
5.38%
1Y
6.98%
3Y*
5.89%
5Y*
4.26%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ERNE.L vs. FLOS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ERNE.L
iShares € Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)
1.18%2.59%4.15%3.38%-0.24%-0.36%0.07%0.32%-0.60%-0.00%
FLOS.L
iShares $ Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist)
5.38%-0.68%11.37%8.25%-4.37%6.62%-5.26%8.94%-1.68%4.01%

Correlation

The correlation between ERNE.L and FLOS.L is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2017

0.05

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ERNE.L vs. FLOS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ERNE.L
ERNE.L Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
ERNE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ERNE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
ERNE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
ERNE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
ERNE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

FLOS.L
FLOS.L Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
FLOS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLOS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLOS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
FLOS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLOS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ERNE.L vs. FLOS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares € Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (ERNE.L) and iShares $ Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (FLOS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ERNE.LFLOS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.89

1.32

+0.56

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

12.25

4.55

+7.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

68.00

12.38

+55.61

ERNE.L vs. FLOS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ERNE.L Sharpe Ratio is 3.77, which is higher than the FLOS.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ERNE.L and FLOS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ERNE.L vs. FLOS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ERNE.L drawdown since its inception was -3.05%, smaller than the maximum FLOS.L drawdown of -23.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ERNE.L and FLOS.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ERNE.LFLOS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.05%

-23.79%

+20.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.18%

-1.52%

+1.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.33%

-5.94%

+5.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-1.12%

-7.53%

+6.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-3.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.28%

-2.68%

+2.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.03%

0.56%

-0.53%

Volatility

ERNE.L vs. FLOS.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares € Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (ERNE.L) is 0.20%, while iShares $ Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (FLOS.L) has a volatility of 0.89%. This indicates that ERNE.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLOS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ERNE.LFLOS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.20%

0.89%

-0.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.48%

2.68%

-2.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58%

4.00%

-3.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.60%

5.63%

-5.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.75%

7.29%

-6.54%

ERNE.L vs. FLOS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

ERNE.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than FLOS.L's 0.12% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ERNE.L vs. FLOS.L - Dividend Comparison

ERNE.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.33%, less than FLOS.L's 4.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ERNE.L
iShares € Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)
2.33%2.74%3.80%2.17%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.03%0.13%
FLOS.L
iShares $ Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist)
4.68%5.02%5.93%5.46%1.50%0.57%1.62%2.95%2.27%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ERNE.L and FLOS.L have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ERNE.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ERNE.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for FLOS.L.

ERNE.L tracks Markit iBoxx EUR Liquid Investment Grade Ultrashort Index (EUR), while FLOS.L tracks iShares $ Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist). Their fees differ too: 0.09% for ERNE.L and 0.12% for FLOS.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ERNE.L and FLOS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer