PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CBRE vs. LDOS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CBRE vs. LDOS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CBRE Group, Inc. (CBRE) and Leidos Holdings, Inc. (LDOS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CBRE achieves a -17.03% return, which is significantly higher than LDOS's -32.12% return. Over the past 10 years, CBRE has outperformed LDOS with an annualized return of 16.65%, while LDOS has yielded a comparatively lower 14.97% annualized return.


CBRE

1D
1.14%
1M
2.66%
YTD
-17.03%
6M
-16.40%
1Y
0.33%
3Y*
18.96%
5Y*
8.50%
10Y*
16.65%

LDOS

1D
0.07%
1M
-1.24%
YTD
-32.12%
6M
-35.31%
1Y
-17.31%
3Y*
14.74%
5Y*
4.03%
10Y*
14.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CBRE vs. LDOS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CBRE
CBRE Group, Inc.
-17.03%22.47%41.04%20.96%-29.08%73.01%2.33%53.07%-7.55%37.54%
LDOS
Leidos Holdings, Inc.
-32.12%26.50%34.52%4.50%20.04%-14.20%8.95%88.82%-16.72%29.14%

Correlation

The correlation between CBRE and LDOS is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2006

0.39

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CBRE:

$39.62B

LDOS:

$15.64B

EPS

CBRE:

$4.37

LDOS:

$10.92

PE Ratio

CBRE:

30.51

LDOS:

11.19

PS Ratio

CBRE:

0.95

LDOS:

0.92

PB Ratio

CBRE:

4.65

LDOS:

3.12

Total Revenue (TTM)

CBRE:

$42.17B

LDOS:

$17.33B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CBRE:

$14.76B

LDOS:

$3.04B

EBITDA (TTM)

CBRE:

$2.68B

LDOS:

$2.34B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CBRE vs. LDOS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CBRE
CBRE Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
CBRE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBRE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBRE Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
CBRE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBRE Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

LDOS
LDOS Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
LDOS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LDOS Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
LDOS Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
LDOS Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
LDOS Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CBRE vs. LDOS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CBRE Group, Inc. (CBRE) and Leidos Holdings, Inc. (LDOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CBRELDOSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

0.91

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.06

-0.43

+0.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.13

-1.09

+0.96

CBRE vs. LDOS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CBRE Sharpe Ratio is -0.05, which is higher than the LDOS Sharpe Ratio of -0.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CBRE and LDOS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CBRE vs. LDOS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CBRE drawdown since its inception was -94.31%, which is greater than LDOS's maximum drawdown of -54.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBRE and LDOS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CBRELDOSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.31%

-54.72%

-39.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.37%

-38.73%

+11.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.37%

-38.73%

+11.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.38%

-38.73%

-1.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-53.57%

-42.29%

-11.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-22.26%

-38.49%

+16.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.58%

-19.68%

-6.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.80%

15.33%

-3.53%

Volatility

CBRE vs. LDOS - Volatility Comparison

CBRE Group, Inc. (CBRE) has a higher volatility of 10.16% compared to Leidos Holdings, Inc. (LDOS) at 6.30%. This indicates that CBRE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LDOS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CBRELDOSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.16%

6.30%

+3.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.85%

25.00%

+0.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.61%

29.28%

+1.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.29%

26.73%

+3.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.01%

27.48%

+5.53%

Dividends

CBRE vs. LDOS - Dividend Comparison

CBRE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LDOS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CBRE
CBRE Group, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LDOS
Leidos Holdings, Inc.
1.36%0.90%1.07%1.35%1.37%1.57%1.29%1.35%2.43%1.98%29.17%3.41%

Financials

CBRE vs. LDOS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CBRE Group, Inc. and Leidos Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B12.00B20222023202420252026
10.53B
4.40B
(CBRE) Total Revenue
(LDOS) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CBRE vs. LDOS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between CBRE Group, Inc. and Leidos Holdings, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
17.6%
17.3%
Portfolio components
CBRE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CBRE Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.85B and revenue of 10.53B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 17.6%.

LDOS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Leidos Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 761.00M and revenue of 4.40B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 17.3%.

CBRE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CBRE Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 511.00M and revenue of 10.53B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.9%.

LDOS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Leidos Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 508.00M and revenue of 4.40B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.6%.

CBRE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CBRE Group, Inc. reported a net income of 318.00M and revenue of 10.53B, resulting in a net margin of 3.0%.

LDOS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Leidos Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 328.00M and revenue of 4.40B, resulting in a net margin of 7.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CBRE and LDOS have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CBRE has higher volatility (10.16%) compared to LDOS (6.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CBRE dropped -94.31% vs LDOS's -54.72%.

CBRE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.05 vs -0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CBRE and LDOS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer