CBOY vs. PBFR
CBOY (Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - July) and PBFR (PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. CBOY is passively managed, while PBFR is actively managed. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CBOY charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for PBFR.
Performance
CBOY vs. PBFR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CBOY achieves a -0.57% return, which is significantly lower than PBFR's 4.52% return.
CBOY
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.10%
- YTD
- -0.57%
- 6M
- -1.12%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PBFR
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- 1.58%
- YTD
- 4.52%
- 6M
- 5.34%
- 1Y
- 12.83%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CBOY vs. PBFR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CBOY Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - July | -0.57% | -0.40% |
PBFR PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF | 4.52% | 5.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between CBOY and PBFR is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2025 | 0.32 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CBOY vs. PBFR — Risk / Return Rank
CBOY
PBFR
CBOY vs. PBFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - July (CBOY) and PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF (PBFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CBOY | PBFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.99 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.32 | 1.54 | -1.86 |
Drawdowns
CBOY vs. PBFR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CBOY drawdown since its inception was -3.99%, smaller than the maximum PBFR drawdown of -8.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBOY and PBFR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CBOY | PBFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.99% | -8.50% | +4.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.82% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.38% | -0.16% | -3.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.18% | -0.63% | -1.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.53% | — |
Volatility
CBOY vs. PBFR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CBOY | PBFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.64% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 3.34% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.32% | 4.33% | -1.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.32% | 6.89% | -3.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.32% | 6.89% | -3.57% |
CBOY vs. PBFR - Expense Ratio Comparison
CBOY has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than PBFR's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
CBOY vs. PBFR - Dividend Comparison
CBOY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.38%, more than PBFR's 0.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
CBOY Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - July | 1.38% | 1.37% | 0.00% |
PBFR PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CBOY and PBFR have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PBFR is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PBFR is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for CBOY.
CBOY has the higher dividend yield at 1.38%, compared with 0.01% for PBFR.
They also come from different issuers: Calamos and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for CBOY and 0.50% for PBFR.
Find the right allocation for CBOY and PBFR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer