PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CBOX vs. CAGE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CBOX vs. CAGE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos Tax-Aware Collateral ETF (CBOX) and Calamos Autocallable Growth ETF (CAGE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


CBOX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.40%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

CAGE

1D
1.21%
1M
0.07%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$2.32M$3.14M$2.71M
$7.89M$8.89M$7.14M

CBOX vs. CAGE - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CBOX and CAGE is 0.06, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 17, 2026

0.06

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CBOX vs. CAGE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Tax-Aware Collateral ETF (CBOX) and Calamos Autocallable Growth ETF (CAGE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CBOX vs. CAGE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CBOX vs. CAGE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CBOX drawdown since its inception was -2.90%, smaller than the maximum CAGE drawdown of -6.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBOX and CAGE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CBOXCAGEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.90%

-6.67%

+3.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.30%

-2.98%

+0.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.47%

-2.05%

+0.58%

Volatility

CBOX vs. CAGE - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CBOXCAGEDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.83%

21.63%

-13.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.83%

21.63%

-13.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.83%

21.63%

-13.80%

CBOX vs. CAGE - Expense Ratio Comparison

CBOX has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than CAGE's 0.74% expense ratio.


Dividends

CBOX vs. CAGE - Dividend Comparison

Neither CBOX nor CAGE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


CBOX and CAGE have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CBOX is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CBOX is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for CAGE.

CBOX and CAGE have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

CBOX is categorized as Options Trading, while CAGE is Defined Outcome. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for CBOX and 0.74% for CAGE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CBOX and CAGE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer