PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CBOO vs. CAIQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CBOO vs. CAIQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - October (CBOO) and Calamos Nasdaq Autocallable Income ETF (CAIQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CBOO achieves a -0.04% return, which is significantly lower than CAIQ's 13.25% return.


CBOO

1D
-0.04%
1M
-0.00%
YTD
-0.04%
6M
-0.22%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CAIQ

1D
-0.17%
1M
4.04%
YTD
13.25%
6M
12.74%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CBOO vs. CAIQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CBOO and CAIQ is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2025

0.26

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CBOO vs. CAIQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - October (CBOO) and Calamos Nasdaq Autocallable Income ETF (CAIQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CBOO vs. CAIQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CBOOCAIQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-1.19

2.63

-3.82

Drawdowns

CBOO vs. CAIQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CBOO drawdown since its inception was -2.34%, smaller than the maximum CAIQ drawdown of -9.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBOO and CAIQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CBOOCAIQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.34%

-9.06%

+6.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.72%

-0.27%

-1.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.61%

-1.72%

+0.11%

Volatility

CBOO vs. CAIQ - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CBOOCAIQDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.14%

14.03%

-11.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.14%

14.03%

-11.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.14%

14.03%

-11.89%

CBOO vs. CAIQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

CBOO has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than CAIQ's 0.74% expense ratio.


Dividends

CBOO vs. CAIQ - Dividend Comparison

CBOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%, less than CAIQ's 8.48% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


CBOO and CAIQ have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CBOO is cheaper at 0.69% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CBOO is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for CAIQ.

CAIQ has the higher dividend yield at 8.48%, compared with 0.57% for CBOO.

CBOO is categorized as Defined Outcome, while CAIQ is Nasdaq-100. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for CBOO and 0.74% for CAIQ.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CBOO and CAIQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer