PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CBOO vs. CAGE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CBOO vs. CAGE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - October (CBOO) and Calamos Autocallable Growth ETF (CAGE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


CBOO

1D
0.00%
1M
0.27%
6M
0.71%
YTD
0.43%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

CAGE

1D
3.40%
1M
5.64%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$2.54M$3.19M$2.74M
$37.37K$26.33K$18.92K

CBOO vs. CAGE - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CBOO and CAGE is 0.31, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 16, 2026

0.31

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CBOO vs. CAGE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - October (CBOO) and Calamos Autocallable Growth ETF (CAGE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CBOO vs. CAGE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CBOO vs. CAGE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CBOO drawdown since its inception was -2.34%, smaller than the maximum CAGE drawdown of -6.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBOO and CAGE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CBOOCAGEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.34%

-6.67%

+4.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.26%

0.00%

-1.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.58%

-2.00%

+0.42%

Volatility

CBOO vs. CAGE - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CBOOCAGEDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.95%

22.46%

-20.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.95%

22.46%

-20.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.95%

22.46%

-20.51%

CBOO vs. CAGE - Expense Ratio Comparison

CBOO has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than CAGE's 0.74% expense ratio.


Dividends

CBOO vs. CAGE - Dividend Comparison

CBOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%, while CAGE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


CBOO and CAGE have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CBOO is cheaper at 0.69% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CBOO is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for CAGE.

CBOO has the higher dividend yield at 0.57%, compared with 0.00% for CAGE.

Their fees differ too: 0.69% for CBOO and 0.74% for CAGE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CBOO and CAGE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer