CBON vs. VTIP

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CBON (VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC China Bond ETF) and VTIP (Vanguard Short-Term Inflation-Protected Securities ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CBON is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund tracking the ChinaBond China High Quality Bond Index, while VTIP is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities (TIPS) 0-5 Year Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CBON returned 2.93%/yr vs 3.14%/yr for VTIP. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CBON charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VTIP.

Performance

CBON vs. VTIP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC China Bond ETF (CBON) and Vanguard Short-Term Inflation-Protected Securities ETF (VTIP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CBON achieves a 5.41% return, which is significantly higher than VTIP's 2.05% return. Over the past 10 years, CBON has underperformed VTIP with an annualized return of 2.93%, while VTIP has yielded a comparatively higher 3.14% annualized return.

CBON

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: 1.75%
• YTD: 5.41%
• 6M: 6.88%
• 1Y: 9.26%
• 3Y*: 5.05%
• 5Y*: 2.03%
• 10Y*: 2.93%

VTIP

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.04%
• YTD: 2.05%
• 6M: 2.03%
• 1Y: 4.70%
• 3Y*: 5.26%
• 5Y*: 3.37%
• 10Y*: 3.14%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CBON vs. VTIP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CBON VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC China Bond ETF	5.41%	5.46%	1.85%	2.92%	-7.99%	5.93%	12.01%	2.67%	1.88%	6.96%
VTIP Vanguard Short-Term Inflation-Protected Securities ETF	2.05%	6.07%	4.74%	4.62%	-2.94%	5.36%	4.95%	4.86%	0.56%	0.82%

Correlation

The correlation between CBON and VTIP is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.09
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.22
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.18
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.13
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 12, 2014	0.14

The correlation between CBON and VTIP shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (1 year) to 0.22 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

CBON vs. VTIP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CBON

CBON Risk / Return Rank: 89
CBON Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
CBON Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
CBON Omega Ratio Rank: 87
CBON Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
CBON Martin Ratio Rank: 93

VTIP

VTIP Risk / Return Rank: 93
VTIP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
VTIP Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
VTIP Omega Ratio Rank: 93
VTIP Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
VTIP Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CBON vs. VTIP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC China Bond ETF (CBON) and Vanguard Short-Term Inflation-Protected Securities ETF (VTIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CBON	VTIP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.70	3.15	-0.45
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.09	5.36	-1.27
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.54	1.67	-0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.94	6.75	+0.19
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	25.86	26.06	-0.21
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CBON vs. VTIP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CBON Sharpe Ratio is 2.70, which is comparable to the VTIP Sharpe Ratio of 3.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CBON and VTIP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CBON	VTIP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.70	3.15	-0.45
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.41	1.22	-0.80
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.53	1.15	-0.62
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.42	0.89	-0.47

Drawdowns

CBON vs. VTIP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CBON drawdown since its inception was -14.13%, which is greater than VTIP's maximum drawdown of -6.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBON and VTIP.

Drawdown Indicators

	CBON	VTIP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.13%	-6.27%	-7.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.34%	-0.70%	-0.64%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-4.56%	-0.98%	-3.58%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-14.13%	-5.50%	-8.63%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-14.13%	-6.27%	-7.86%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.02%	-0.02%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.99%	-1.04%	-2.95%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.36%	0.18%	+0.18%

Volatility

CBON vs. VTIP - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC China Bond ETF (CBON) has a higher volatility of 0.91% compared to Vanguard Short-Term Inflation-Protected Securities ETF (VTIP) at 0.43%. This indicates that CBON's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTIP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CBON	VTIP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.91%	0.43%	+0.48%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.62%	1.02%	+1.60%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.45%	1.50%	+1.95%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.93%	2.77%	+2.16%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.58%	2.74%	+2.84%

CBON vs. VTIP - Expense Ratio Comparison

CBON has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than VTIP's 0.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

CBON vs. VTIP - Dividend Comparison

CBON's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.52%, less than VTIP's 3.58% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CBON VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC China Bond ETF	1.52%	1.66%	2.15%	3.01%	2.70%	3.05%	2.87%	3.87%	3.39%	3.33%	3.25%	2.78%
VTIP Vanguard Short-Term Inflation-Protected Securities ETF	3.58%	3.81%	2.70%	2.86%	6.84%	4.68%	1.20%	1.95%	2.45%	1.52%	0.76%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CBON and VTIP in my portfolio?

CBON and VTIP have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CBON or VTIP?

CBON has higher volatility (0.91%) compared to VTIP (0.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CBON dropped -14.13% vs VTIP's -6.27%.

Which ETF is better, CBON or VTIP?

On 10-year performance, VTIP leads with 3.14% vs 2.93% for CBON. On fees, VTIP is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VTIP has been the lower-risk option at 0.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CBON or VTIP?

Over the 10-year period, VTIP has performed better with a 3.14% return vs 2.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CBON or VTIP?

VTIP is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for CBON.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CBON or VTIP?

VTIP has the higher dividend yield at 3.58%, compared with 1.52% for CBON.

What is the main difference between CBON and VTIP?

CBON is categorized as Emerging Markets Bonds, while VTIP is Inflation-Protected Bonds. CBON tracks ChinaBond China High Quality Bond Index, while VTIP tracks Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities (TIPS) 0-5 Year Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for CBON and 0.03% for VTIP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VTIP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.15 vs 2.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.