CBON vs. VIRT
CBON (VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC China Bond ETF) is Emerging Markets Bonds fund tracking the ChinaBond China High Quality Bond Index, while VIRT (Virtu Financial, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, CBON returned 3.01%/yr vs 18.05%/yr for VIRT. Their 0.03 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
CBON vs. VIRT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CBON achieves a 5.29% return, which is significantly lower than VIRT's 81.20% return. Over the past 10 years, CBON has underperformed VIRT with an annualized return of 3.01%, while VIRT has yielded a comparatively higher 18.05% annualized return.
CBON
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- 0.35%
- 6M
- 4.74%
- YTD
- 5.29%
- 1Y
- 8.54%
- 3Y*
- 4.82%
- 5Y*
- 2.11%
- 10Y*
- 3.01%
- ALL TIME*
- 2.44%
VIRT
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- -2.15%
- 6M
- 62.47%
- YTD
- 81.20%
- 1Y
- 38.30%
- 3Y*
- 52.81%
- 5Y*
- 23.17%
- 10Y*
- 18.05%
- ALL TIME*
- 13.40%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $207.99K | $136.05K | $172.83K | |
| $75.83M | $74.91M | $74.80M |
CBON vs. VIRT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CBON VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC China Bond ETF | 5.29% | 5.46% | 1.85% | 2.92% | -7.99% | 5.93% | 12.01% | 2.67% | 1.88% | 6.96% |
VIRT Virtu Financial, Inc. | 81.20% | -4.24% | 83.03% | 4.61% | -26.51% | 18.58% | 64.42% | -34.86% | 45.96% | 21.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between CBON and VIRT is 0.11, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.04 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.08 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 16, 2015 | 0.03 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CBON vs. VIRT — Risk / Return Rank
CBON
VIRT
CBON vs. VIRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC China Bond ETF (CBON) and Virtu Financial, Inc. (VIRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CBON | VIRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.89 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.22 | +0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.42 | 1.46 | +4.96 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 24.44 | 2.68 | +21.76 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CBON vs. VIRT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CBON drawdown since its inception was -14.13%, smaller than the maximum VIRT drawdown of -56.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBON and VIRT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CBON | VIRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.13% | -56.17% | +42.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.34% | -27.30% | +25.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.56% | -27.83% | +23.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.13% | -54.52% | +40.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -14.13% | -56.17% | +42.04% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.33% | -10.60% | +10.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.95% | -25.46% | +21.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.35% | 14.83% | -14.48% |
Volatility
CBON vs. VIRT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC China Bond ETF (CBON) is 1.06%, while Virtu Financial, Inc. (VIRT) has a volatility of 14.15%. This indicates that CBON experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VIRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CBON | VIRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.06% | 14.15% | -13.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.72% | 27.24% | -24.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.57% | 32.11% | -28.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.90% | 32.78% | -27.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.55% | 36.06% | -30.51% |
Dividends
CBON vs. VIRT - Dividend Comparison
CBON's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.51%, less than VIRT's 1.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CBON VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC China Bond ETF | 1.51% | 1.66% | 2.15% | 3.01% | 2.70% | 3.05% | 2.87% | 3.87% | 3.39% | 3.33% | 3.25% | 2.78% |
VIRT Virtu Financial, Inc. | 1.61% | 2.88% | 2.69% | 4.74% | 4.70% | 3.33% | 3.81% | 6.00% | 3.73% | 5.25% | 6.02% | 2.12% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CBON and VIRT have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VIRT has higher volatility (14.15%) compared to CBON (1.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CBON dropped -14.13% vs VIRT's -56.17%.
CBON currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CBON and VIRT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer