CBON vs. JPMB

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CBON (VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC China Bond ETF) and JPMB (JPMorgan USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond ETF) are both Emerging Markets Bonds funds - CBON tracks the ChinaBond China High Quality Bond Index while JPMB tracks the J.P. Morgan Emerging Markets Risk-Aware Bond Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CBON returned 2.03%/yr vs 1.42%/yr for JPMB. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CBON charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for JPMB.

Performance

CBON vs. JPMB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC China Bond ETF (CBON) and JPMorgan USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond ETF (JPMB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CBON achieves a 5.41% return, which is significantly higher than JPMB's 1.60% return.

CBON

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: 1.75%
• YTD: 5.41%
• 6M: 6.88%
• 1Y: 9.26%
• 3Y*: 5.05%
• 5Y*: 2.03%
• 10Y*: 2.93%

JPMB

• 1D: -0.38%
• 1M: 1.30%
• YTD: 1.60%
• 6M: 1.55%
• 1Y: 11.48%
• 3Y*: 7.93%
• 5Y*: 1.42%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CBON vs. JPMB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
CBON VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC China Bond ETF	5.41%	5.46%	1.85%	2.92%	-7.99%	5.93%	12.01%	2.67%	-2.12%
JPMB JPMorgan USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond ETF	1.60%	13.73%	1.46%	9.48%	-16.05%	-2.26%	5.36%	17.71%	-4.72%

Correlation

The correlation between CBON and JPMB is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.31
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.31
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.28
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2018	0.24

CBON vs. JPMB - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CBON	JPMB
Real Estate	100.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	1.4%
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

CBON vs. JPMB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CBON

CBON Risk / Return Rank: 89
CBON Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
CBON Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
CBON Omega Ratio Rank: 87
CBON Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
CBON Martin Ratio Rank: 93

JPMB

JPMB Risk / Return Rank: 63
JPMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
JPMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
JPMB Omega Ratio Rank: 71
JPMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
JPMB Martin Ratio Rank: 61

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CBON vs. JPMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC China Bond ETF (CBON) and JPMorgan USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond ETF (JPMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CBON	JPMB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.70	2.18	+0.52
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.09	3.19	+0.89
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.54	1.43	+0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.94	2.50	+4.44
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	25.86	10.66	+15.19
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CBON vs. JPMB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CBON Sharpe Ratio is 2.70, which is comparable to the JPMB Sharpe Ratio of 2.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CBON and JPMB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CBON	JPMB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.70	2.18	+0.52
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.41	0.16	+0.26
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.53	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.42	0.28	+0.15

Drawdowns

CBON vs. JPMB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CBON drawdown since its inception was -14.13%, smaller than the maximum JPMB drawdown of -26.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBON and JPMB.

Drawdown Indicators

	CBON	JPMB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.13%	-26.33%	+12.20%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.34%	-4.61%	+3.27%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-4.56%	-7.53%	+2.97%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-14.13%	-26.16%	+12.03%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-14.13%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.02%	-0.38%	+0.36%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.99%	-7.06%	+3.07%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.36%	1.08%	-0.72%

Volatility

CBON vs. JPMB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC China Bond ETF (CBON) is 0.91%, while JPMorgan USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond ETF (JPMB) has a volatility of 1.90%. This indicates that CBON experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JPMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CBON	JPMB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.91%	1.90%	-0.99%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.62%	4.37%	-1.75%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.45%	5.29%	-1.84%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.93%	8.94%	-4.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.58%	9.65%	-4.07%

CBON vs. JPMB - Expense Ratio Comparison

CBON has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than JPMB's 0.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

CBON vs. JPMB - Dividend Comparison

CBON's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.52%, less than JPMB's 5.80% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CBON VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC China Bond ETF	1.52%	1.66%	2.15%	3.01%	2.70%	3.05%	2.87%	3.87%	3.39%	3.33%	3.25%	2.78%
JPMB JPMorgan USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond ETF	5.80%	6.71%	6.32%	5.99%	4.94%	4.29%	4.29%	4.51%	4.58%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CBON and JPMB in my portfolio?

CBON and JPMB have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CBON or JPMB?

JPMB has higher volatility (1.90%) compared to CBON (0.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CBON dropped -14.13% vs JPMB's -26.33%.

Which ETF is better, CBON or JPMB?

On 5-year performance, CBON leads with 2.03% vs 1.42% for JPMB. On fees, JPMB is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, CBON has been the lower-risk option at 0.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CBON or JPMB?

Over the 5-year period, CBON has performed better with a 2.03% return vs 1.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CBON or JPMB?

JPMB is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for CBON.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CBON or JPMB?

JPMB has the higher dividend yield at 5.80%, compared with 1.52% for CBON.

What is the main difference between CBON and JPMB?

CBON tracks ChinaBond China High Quality Bond Index, while JPMB tracks J.P. Morgan Emerging Markets Risk-Aware Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for CBON and 0.39% for JPMB.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CBON currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs 2.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.