PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CBOL vs. OCTB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CBOL vs. OCTB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos Laddered Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF (CBOL) and Aptus October Buffer ETF (OCTB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CBOL achieves a -2.03% return, which is significantly lower than OCTB's 6.18% return.


CBOL

1D
-0.13%
1M
-0.78%
YTD
-2.03%
6M
-2.60%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

OCTB

1D
-0.17%
1M
2.41%
YTD
6.18%
6M
6.75%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CBOL vs. OCTB - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CBOL and OCTB is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 15, 2025

0.48

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CBOL vs. OCTB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Laddered Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF (CBOL) and Aptus October Buffer ETF (OCTB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CBOL vs. OCTB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CBOLOCTBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-1.80

1.97

-3.77

Drawdowns

CBOL vs. OCTB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CBOL drawdown since its inception was -4.91%, roughly equal to the maximum OCTB drawdown of -4.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBOL and OCTB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CBOLOCTBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.91%

-4.79%

-0.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.64%

-0.17%

-4.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.21%

-0.70%

-2.51%

Volatility

CBOL vs. OCTB - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CBOLOCTBDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.88%

7.20%

-3.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.88%

7.20%

-3.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.88%

7.20%

-3.32%

CBOL vs. OCTB - Expense Ratio Comparison

CBOL has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than OCTB's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

CBOL vs. OCTB - Dividend Comparison

CBOL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.83%, while OCTB has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


CBOL and OCTB have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, OCTB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

OCTB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for CBOL.

CBOL has the higher dividend yield at 1.83%, compared with 0.00% for OCTB.

They also come from different issuers: Calamos and Aptus Capital Advisors. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for CBOL and 0.25% for OCTB.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CBOL and OCTB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer