CBOJ vs. UXJL

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CBOJ (Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - January) and UXJL (FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July) are both Defined Outcome funds. CBOJ is passively managed, while UXJL is actively managed. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CBOJ charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for UXJL.

Performance

CBOJ vs. UXJL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - January (CBOJ) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July (UXJL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CBOJ achieves a -1.37% return, which is significantly lower than UXJL's 11.78% return.

CBOJ

• 1D: -0.18%
• 1M: -1.59%
• YTD: -1.37%
• 6M: -2.70%
• 1Y: -3.88%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

UXJL

• 1D: -0.76%
• 1M: 6.02%
• YTD: 11.78%
• 6M: 11.50%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CBOJ vs. UXJL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CBOJ Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - January	-1.37%	-4.42%
UXJL FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July	11.78%	9.31%

Correlation

The correlation between CBOJ and UXJL is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 22, 2025	0.41

Return for Risk

CBOJ vs. UXJL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CBOJ

CBOJ Risk / Return Rank: 4
CBOJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
CBOJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
CBOJ Omega Ratio Rank: 3
CBOJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
CBOJ Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CBOJ vs. UXJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - January (CBOJ) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July (UXJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CBOJ	UXJL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.78	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.05	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.88	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.48	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.77	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CBOJ	UXJL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.78	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.35	1.87	-2.22

Drawdowns

CBOJ vs. UXJL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CBOJ drawdown since its inception was -8.13%, smaller than the maximum UXJL drawdown of -10.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBOJ and UXJL.

Drawdown Indicators

	CBOJ	UXJL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.13%	-10.29%	+2.16%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.13%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.70%	-0.76%	-6.94%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.13%	-1.51%	-1.62%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.04%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CBOJ	UXJL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.84%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.50%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.97%	13.90%	-8.93%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.58%	13.90%	-9.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.58%	13.90%	-9.32%

CBOJ vs. UXJL - Expense Ratio Comparison

CBOJ has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than UXJL's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

CBOJ vs. UXJL - Dividend Comparison

CBOJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.20%, while UXJL has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
CBOJ Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - January	3.20%	3.16%
UXJL FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CBOJ and UXJL in my portfolio?

CBOJ and UXJL have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CBOJ or UXJL?

On fees, CBOJ is cheaper at 0.69% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CBOJ or UXJL?

CBOJ is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for UXJL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CBOJ or UXJL?

CBOJ has the higher dividend yield at 3.20%, compared with 0.00% for UXJL.

What is the main difference between CBOJ and UXJL?

They also come from different issuers: Calamos and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for CBOJ and 0.85% for UXJL.