CBOE vs. NEM
CBOE (Cboe Global Markets, Inc.) and NEM (Newmont Corporation) are both stocks. CBOE operates in Financial Data & Stock Exchanges (Financial Services), while NEM operates in Gold (Basic Materials). Over the past 10 years, CBOE returned 17.38%/yr vs 13.46%/yr for NEM. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CBOE vs. NEM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CBOE achieves a 12.19% return, which is significantly higher than NEM's -0.43% return. Over the past 10 years, CBOE has outperformed NEM with an annualized return of 17.38%, while NEM has yielded a comparatively lower 13.46% annualized return.
CBOE
- 1D
- -0.56%
- 1M
- -19.41%
- YTD
- 12.19%
- 6M
- 11.21%
- 1Y
- 27.25%
- 3Y*
- 27.99%
- 5Y*
- 21.30%
- 10Y*
- 17.38%
NEM
- 1D
- -0.72%
- 1M
- -14.84%
- YTD
- -0.43%
- 6M
- 11.71%
- 1Y
- 91.07%
- 3Y*
- 36.63%
- 5Y*
- 10.33%
- 10Y*
- 13.46%
CBOE vs. NEM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CBOE Cboe Global Markets, Inc. | 12.19% | 29.96% | 10.74% | 44.37% | -2.16% | 42.23% | -21.17% | 24.16% | -20.60% | 70.49% |
NEM Newmont Corporation | -0.43% | 172.82% | -7.83% | -8.76% | -20.77% | 7.40% | 40.28% | 30.52% | -6.15% | 10.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between CBOE and NEM is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.00 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2010 | 0.07 |
The correlation between CBOE and NEM shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (1 year) to 0.07 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CBOE:
$11.77
NEM:
$6.34
CBOE:
23.83
NEM:
15.62
CBOE:
0.44
NEM:
0.41
CBOE:
6.14
NEM:
4.77
CBOE:
$4.79B
NEM:
$17.23B
CBOE:
$2.50B
NEM:
$8.97B
CBOE:
$1.87B
NEM:
$13.78B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CBOE vs. NEM — Risk / Return Rank
CBOE
NEM
CBOE vs. NEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cboe Global Markets, Inc. (CBOE) and Newmont Corporation (NEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CBOE | NEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.94 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.81 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.32 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.11 | 3.36 | -2.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.44 | 8.94 | -3.50 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CBOE | NEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.01 | 1.96 | -0.94 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 | 0.27 | +0.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.69 | 0.38 | +0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.66 | 0.12 | +0.53 |
Drawdowns
CBOE vs. NEM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CBOE drawdown since its inception was -43.23%, smaller than the maximum NEM drawdown of -81.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBOE and NEM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CBOE | NEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.23% | -81.30% | +38.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.69% | -27.25% | +2.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.69% | -36.57% | +11.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.69% | -62.40% | +37.71% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.23% | -62.40% | +19.17% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.40% | -24.65% | +1.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.40% | -41.38% | +29.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.02% | 10.22% | -5.20% |
Volatility
CBOE vs. NEM - Volatility Comparison
Cboe Global Markets, Inc. (CBOE) has a higher volatility of 15.60% compared to Newmont Corporation (NEM) at 14.19%. This indicates that CBOE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CBOE | NEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.60% | 14.19% | +1.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.74% | 36.93% | -13.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.02% | 46.87% | -19.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.17% | 37.83% | -14.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.32% | 35.59% | -10.27% |
Dividends
CBOE vs. NEM - Dividend Comparison
CBOE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, which matches NEM's 1.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CBOE Cboe Global Markets, Inc. | 1.03% | 1.08% | 1.21% | 1.18% | 1.56% | 1.38% | 1.68% | 1.12% | 1.19% | 0.83% | 1.30% | 1.36% |
NEM Newmont Corporation | 1.03% | 1.00% | 2.69% | 3.87% | 4.66% | 3.55% | 1.74% | 3.31% | 1.62% | 0.67% | 0.37% | 0.56% |
Financials
CBOE vs. NEM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cboe Global Markets, Inc. and Newmont Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
CBOE and NEM have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CBOE has higher volatility (15.60%) compared to NEM (14.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CBOE dropped -43.23% vs NEM's -81.30%.
NEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CBOE and NEM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer