CBOE vs. LULU

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

CBOE (Cboe Global Markets, Inc.) and LULU (Lululemon Athletica Inc.) are both stocks. CBOE operates in Financial Data & Stock Exchanges (Financial Services), while LULU operates in Apparel Retail (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 10 years, CBOE returned 17.38%/yr vs 5.24%/yr for LULU. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

CBOE vs. LULU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cboe Global Markets, Inc. (CBOE) and Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CBOE achieves a 12.19% return, which is significantly higher than LULU's -43.43% return. Over the past 10 years, CBOE has outperformed LULU with an annualized return of 17.38%, while LULU has yielded a comparatively lower 5.24% annualized return.

CBOE

• 1D: -0.56%
• 1M: -19.41%
• YTD: 12.19%
• 6M: 11.21%
• 1Y: 27.25%
• 3Y*: 27.99%
• 5Y*: 21.30%
• 10Y*: 17.38%

LULU

• 1D: 2.91%
• 1M: -10.39%
• YTD: -43.43%
• 6M: -35.78%
• 1Y: -55.69%
• 3Y*: -31.16%
• 5Y*: -18.52%
• 10Y*: 5.24%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CBOE vs. LULU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CBOE Cboe Global Markets, Inc.	12.19%	29.96%	10.74%	44.37%	-2.16%	42.23%	-21.17%	24.16%	-20.60%	70.49%
LULU Lululemon Athletica Inc.	-43.43%	-45.66%	-25.21%	59.59%	-18.16%	12.48%	50.23%	90.50%	54.74%	20.93%

Correlation

The correlation between CBOE and LULU is -0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.10
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.10
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.10
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.11
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2010	0.15

The correlation between CBOE and LULU shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (3 years) to 0.15 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap CBOE : $29.43B LULU : $13.57B
EPS CBOE : $11.77 LULU : $12.35
PE Ratio CBOE : 23.83 LULU : 9.52
PEG Ratio CBOE : 0.44 LULU : 0.46
PS Ratio CBOE : 6.14 LULU : 1.24
PB Ratio CBOE : 5.48 LULU : 2.70
Total Revenue (TTM) CBOE : $4.79B LULU : $11.20B
Gross Profit (TTM) CBOE : $2.50B LULU : $6.24B
EBITDA (TTM) CBOE : $1.87B LULU : $2.44B

Return for Risk

CBOE vs. LULU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CBOE

CBOE Risk / Return Rank: 69
CBOE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
CBOE Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
CBOE Omega Ratio Rank: 67
CBOE Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
CBOE Martin Ratio Rank: 78

LULU

LULU Risk / Return Rank: 2
LULU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
LULU Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
LULU Omega Ratio Rank: 3
LULU Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
LULU Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CBOE vs. LULU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cboe Global Markets, Inc. (CBOE) and Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CBOE	LULU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.01	-1.26	+2.28
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.45	-1.97	+3.42
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	0.75	+0.45
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.11	-1.00	+2.11
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.44	-1.73	+7.17
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CBOE vs. LULU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CBOE Sharpe Ratio is 1.01, which is higher than the LULU Sharpe Ratio of -1.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CBOE and LULU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CBOE	LULU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.01	-1.26	+2.28
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.92	-0.44	+1.37
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.69	0.13	+0.56
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.66	0.24	+0.41

Drawdowns

CBOE vs. LULU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CBOE drawdown since its inception was -43.23%, smaller than the maximum LULU drawdown of -92.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBOE and LULU.

Drawdown Indicators

	CBOE	LULU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.23%	-92.26%	+49.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-24.69%	-55.90%	+31.21%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.69%	-77.66%	+52.97%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.69%	-77.66%	+52.97%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-43.23%	-77.66%	+34.43%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-23.40%	-77.01%	+53.61%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.40%	-27.57%	+16.17%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.02%	33.71%	-28.69%

Volatility

CBOE vs. LULU - Volatility Comparison

Cboe Global Markets, Inc. (CBOE) has a higher volatility of 15.60% compared to Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU) at 13.25%. This indicates that CBOE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LULU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CBOE	LULU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.60%	13.25%	+2.35%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	23.74%	32.89%	-9.15%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	27.02%	44.36%	-17.34%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.17%	42.19%	-19.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.32%	40.61%	-15.29%

Dividends

CBOE vs. LULU - Dividend Comparison

CBOE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, while LULU has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CBOE Cboe Global Markets, Inc.	1.03%	1.08%	1.21%	1.18%	1.56%	1.38%	1.68%	1.12%	1.19%	0.83%	1.30%	1.36%
LULU Lululemon Athletica Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Financials

CBOE vs. LULU - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Cboe Global Markets, Inc. and Lululemon Athletica Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

CBOE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cboe Global Markets, Inc. reported a gross profit of 669.90M and revenue of 1.27B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.6%.

LULU - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lululemon Athletica Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.34B and revenue of 2.47B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 54.2%.

CBOE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cboe Global Markets, Inc. reported an operating income of 505.60M and revenue of 1.27B, resulting in an operating margin of 39.7%.

LULU - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lululemon Athletica Inc. reported an operating income of 276.95M and revenue of 2.47B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.2%.

CBOE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cboe Global Markets, Inc. reported a net income of 385.70M and revenue of 1.27B, resulting in a net margin of 30.3%.

LULU - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lululemon Athletica Inc. reported a net income of 195.05M and revenue of 2.47B, resulting in a net margin of 7.9%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CBOE and LULU in my portfolio?

CBOE and LULU have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CBOE or LULU?

CBOE has higher volatility (15.60%) compared to LULU (13.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CBOE dropped -43.23% vs LULU's -92.26%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CBOE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.01 vs -1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.