PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CBO.TO vs. XFR.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CBO.TO vs. XFR.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares 1-5 Year Laddered Corporate Bond Index ETF (CBO.TO) and iShares Floating Rate Index ETF (XFR.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with CBO.TO having a 1.02% return and XFR.TO slightly lower at 1.00%. Over the past 10 years, CBO.TO has outperformed XFR.TO with an annualized return of 2.50%, while XFR.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 2.24% annualized return.


CBO.TO

1D
-0.05%
1M
0.94%
YTD
1.02%
6M
1.01%
1Y
3.73%
3Y*
5.68%
5Y*
2.60%
10Y*
2.50%

XFR.TO

1D
-0.05%
1M
0.21%
YTD
1.00%
6M
1.33%
1Y
2.96%
3Y*
3.98%
5Y*
3.20%
10Y*
2.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CBO.TO vs. XFR.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CBO.TO
iShares 1-5 Year Laddered Corporate Bond Index ETF
1.02%4.69%6.82%6.47%-4.89%-1.04%5.84%4.54%1.27%0.52%
XFR.TO
iShares Floating Rate Index ETF
1.00%3.33%4.57%5.29%1.82%0.15%0.98%2.23%1.16%1.46%

Correlation

The correlation between CBO.TO and XFR.TO is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.02

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.02

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2011

0.01

The correlation between CBO.TO and XFR.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.01 (all time) to 0.12 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CBO.TO vs. XFR.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CBO.TO
CBO.TO Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
CBO.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBO.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBO.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
CBO.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBO.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

XFR.TO
XFR.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
XFR.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XFR.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
XFR.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
XFR.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
XFR.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CBO.TO vs. XFR.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares 1-5 Year Laddered Corporate Bond Index ETF (CBO.TO) and iShares Floating Rate Index ETF (XFR.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CBO.TOXFR.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.96

-0.68

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.32

29.79

-27.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.72

88.61

-79.89

CBO.TO vs. XFR.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CBO.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is lower than the XFR.TO Sharpe Ratio of 4.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CBO.TO and XFR.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CBO.TOXFR.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.57

4.12

-2.55

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

3.92

-3.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

1.22

-0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.94

1.19

-0.24

Drawdowns

CBO.TO vs. XFR.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CBO.TO drawdown since its inception was -11.67%, which is greater than XFR.TO's maximum drawdown of -4.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBO.TO and XFR.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CBO.TOXFR.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.67%

-4.12%

-7.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.61%

-0.10%

-1.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.61%

-0.30%

-1.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-8.22%

-0.30%

-7.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-11.67%

-4.12%

-7.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.05%

-0.05%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.96%

-0.06%

-0.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.43%

0.03%

+0.40%

Volatility

CBO.TO vs. XFR.TO - Volatility Comparison

iShares 1-5 Year Laddered Corporate Bond Index ETF (CBO.TO) has a higher volatility of 0.83% compared to iShares Floating Rate Index ETF (XFR.TO) at 0.18%. This indicates that CBO.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XFR.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CBO.TOXFR.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.83%

0.18%

+0.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.86%

0.48%

+1.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.39%

0.72%

+1.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.97%

0.82%

+2.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.59%

1.85%

+1.74%

CBO.TO vs. XFR.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

CBO.TO has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is higher than XFR.TO's 0.14% expense ratio.


Dividends

CBO.TO vs. XFR.TO - Dividend Comparison

CBO.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.45%, more than XFR.TO's 2.77% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CBO.TO
iShares 1-5 Year Laddered Corporate Bond Index ETF
3.45%3.37%3.09%2.81%2.67%2.55%2.55%2.65%2.74%2.80%3.03%3.86%
XFR.TO
iShares Floating Rate Index ETF
2.77%3.23%4.93%4.91%1.85%0.30%1.07%1.96%1.60%0.95%0.77%0.94%

Frequently Asked Questions


CBO.TO and XFR.TO have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XFR.TO is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XFR.TO is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for CBO.TO.

Both ETFs track Morningstar Can 1-5Y Core Bd GR CAD. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for CBO.TO and 0.14% for XFR.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CBO.TO and XFR.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer