CBLS vs. HEFT
CBLS (Changebridge Capital Long/Short Equity ETF) and HEFT (Hedgeye Fourth Turning ETF) are both Long-Short funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CBLS charges 1.95%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for HEFT.
Performance
CBLS vs. HEFT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CBLS achieves a 24.21% return, which is significantly higher than HEFT's 7.91% return.
CBLS
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 8.64%
- YTD
- 24.21%
- 6M
- 22.60%
- 1Y
- 21.18%
- 3Y*
- 19.87%
- 5Y*
- 5.59%
- 10Y*
- —
HEFT
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 4.12%
- YTD
- 7.91%
- 6M
- 7.32%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CBLS vs. HEFT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CBLS Changebridge Capital Long/Short Equity ETF | 24.21% | 1.89% |
HEFT Hedgeye Fourth Turning ETF | 7.91% | 0.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between CBLS and HEFT is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2025 | 0.53 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CBLS vs. HEFT — Risk / Return Rank
CBLS
HEFT
CBLS vs. HEFT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Changebridge Capital Long/Short Equity ETF (CBLS) and Hedgeye Fourth Turning ETF (HEFT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CBLS | HEFT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.39 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.96 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.61 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.36 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CBLS | HEFT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.39 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | 1.44 | -0.81 |
Drawdowns
CBLS vs. HEFT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CBLS drawdown since its inception was -32.78%, which is greater than HEFT's maximum drawdown of -9.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBLS and HEFT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CBLS | HEFT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.78% | -9.17% | -23.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.15% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.27% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.24% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -2.64% | +2.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.79% | -3.13% | -9.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.34% | — | — |
Volatility
CBLS vs. HEFT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CBLS | HEFT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.07% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.56% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.27% | 12.53% | +2.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.64% | 12.53% | +3.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.13% | 12.53% | +3.60% |
CBLS vs. HEFT - Expense Ratio Comparison
CBLS has a 1.95% expense ratio, which is higher than HEFT's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
CBLS vs. HEFT - Dividend Comparison
CBLS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.72%, more than HEFT's 0.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CBLS Changebridge Capital Long/Short Equity ETF | 0.72% | 0.90% | 0.73% | 0.44% |
HEFT Hedgeye Fourth Turning ETF | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CBLS and HEFT have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HEFT is cheaper at 0.70% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HEFT is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 1.95% for CBLS.
CBLS has the higher dividend yield at 0.72%, compared with 0.02% for HEFT.
They also come from different issuers: Changebridge Capital LLC and Hedgeye. Their fees differ too: 1.95% for CBLS and 0.70% for HEFT.
Find the right allocation for CBLS and HEFT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer