PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CBLS vs. HDG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CBLS vs. HDG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Changebridge Capital Long/Short Equity ETF (CBLS) and ProShares Hedge Replication (HDG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CBLS achieves a 24.17% return, which is significantly higher than HDG's 6.79% return.


CBLS

1D
3.27%
1M
9.60%
YTD
24.17%
6M
23.40%
1Y
20.95%
3Y*
19.86%
5Y*
5.73%
10Y*

HDG

1D
0.14%
1M
2.31%
YTD
6.79%
6M
7.48%
1Y
13.92%
3Y*
7.69%
5Y*
3.13%
10Y*
3.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CBLS vs. HDG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
CBLS
Changebridge Capital Long/Short Equity ETF
24.17%5.87%28.74%-2.67%-11.64%2.85%14.15%
HDG
ProShares Hedge Replication
6.79%7.18%5.12%7.14%-8.48%2.97%4.46%

Correlation

The correlation between CBLS and HDG is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2020

0.63

The correlation between CBLS and HDG shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (1 year) to 0.63 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

CBLS vs. HDG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CBLS
HDG

Technology

32.3%
17.0%

Energy

10.0%
6.1%

Healthcare

9.2%
16.5%

Utilities

7.5%
2.9%

Basic Materials

7.5%
4.8%

Industrials

3.8%
17.7%

Consumer Cyclical

0.4%
8.4%

Communication Services

-2.0%
2.4%

Real Estate

-2.4%
6.1%

Consumer Defensive

-3.8%
2.4%

Financial Services

-6.8%
15.8%

Technology

CBLS
32.3%
HDG
17.0%

Energy

CBLS
10.0%
HDG
6.1%

Healthcare

CBLS
9.2%
HDG
16.5%

Utilities

CBLS
7.5%
HDG
2.9%

Basic Materials

CBLS
7.5%
HDG
4.8%

Industrials

CBLS
3.8%
HDG
17.7%

Consumer Cyclical

CBLS
0.4%
HDG
8.4%

Communication Services

CBLS
-2.0%
HDG
2.4%

Real Estate

CBLS
-2.4%
HDG
6.1%

Consumer Defensive

CBLS
-3.8%
HDG
2.4%

Financial Services

CBLS
-6.8%
HDG
15.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CBLS vs. HDG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CBLS
CBLS Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
CBLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBLS Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
CBLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBLS Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

HDG
HDG Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
HDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
HDG Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
HDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
HDG Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CBLS vs. HDG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Changebridge Capital Long/Short Equity ETF (CBLS) and ProShares Hedge Replication (HDG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CBLSHDGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.38

2.49

-1.11

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.94

3.69

-1.76

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.49

-0.24

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.71

3.51

-0.81

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.61

14.55

-7.94

CBLS vs. HDG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CBLS Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is lower than the HDG Sharpe Ratio of 2.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CBLS and HDG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CBLSHDGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.38

2.49

-1.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

0.44

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

0.44

+0.20

Drawdowns

CBLS vs. HDG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CBLS drawdown since its inception was -32.78%, which is greater than HDG's maximum drawdown of -15.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBLS and HDG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CBLSHDGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.78%

-15.31%

-17.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.15%

-3.97%

-4.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.27%

-7.20%

-8.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.24%

-15.31%

-15.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.80%

-2.77%

-10.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.34%

0.96%

+2.38%

Volatility

CBLS vs. HDG - Volatility Comparison

Changebridge Capital Long/Short Equity ETF (CBLS) has a higher volatility of 7.08% compared to ProShares Hedge Replication (HDG) at 2.01%. This indicates that CBLS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HDG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CBLSHDGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.08%

2.01%

+5.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.62%

4.57%

+8.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.29%

5.62%

+9.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.64%

7.15%

+8.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.13%

7.11%

+9.02%

CBLS vs. HDG - Expense Ratio Comparison

CBLS has a 1.95% expense ratio, which is higher than HDG's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

CBLS vs. HDG - Dividend Comparison

CBLS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.72%, less than HDG's 2.34% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CBLS
Changebridge Capital Long/Short Equity ETF
0.72%0.90%0.73%0.44%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HDG
ProShares Hedge Replication
2.34%2.55%3.50%3.48%0.39%0.00%0.08%1.09%0.51%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CBLS and HDG have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CBLS has higher volatility (7.08%) compared to HDG (2.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CBLS dropped -32.78% vs HDG's -15.31%.

On 5-year performance, CBLS leads with 5.73% vs 3.13% for HDG. On fees, HDG is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, HDG has been the lower-risk option at 2.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, CBLS has performed better with a 5.73% return vs 3.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HDG is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.95% for CBLS.

HDG has the higher dividend yield at 2.34%, compared with 0.72% for CBLS.

They also come from different issuers: Changebridge Capital LLC and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 1.95% for CBLS and 0.95% for HDG.

HDG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CBLS and HDG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer