CBLS vs. DWAT
CBLS (Changebridge Capital Long/Short Equity ETF) and DWAT (Arrow DWA Tactical: Macro ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CBLS is a Long-Short fund actively managed by Changebridge Capital LLC, while DWAT is a Tactical Allocation fund actively managed by Arrow Funds. Both are actively managed. CBLS charges 1.95%/yr vs 1.83%/yr for DWAT.
Performance
CBLS vs. DWAT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CBLS
- 1D
- 3.27%
- 1M
- 9.60%
- YTD
- 24.17%
- 6M
- 23.40%
- 1Y
- 20.95%
- 3Y*
- 19.86%
- 5Y*
- 5.73%
- 10Y*
- —
DWAT
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CBLS vs. DWAT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
CBLS Changebridge Capital Long/Short Equity ETF | 12.55% |
DWAT Arrow DWA Tactical: Macro ETF | 0.00% |
CBLS vs. DWAT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CBLS
DWAT
Technology
Energy
Healthcare
Utilities
Basic Materials
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
Financial Services
Technology
CBLS
DWAT
Energy
CBLS
DWAT
Healthcare
CBLS
DWAT
Utilities
CBLS
DWAT
Basic Materials
CBLS
DWAT
Industrials
CBLS
DWAT
Consumer Cyclical
CBLS
DWAT
Communication Services
CBLS
DWAT
Real Estate
CBLS
DWAT
Consumer Defensive
CBLS
DWAT
Financial Services
CBLS
DWAT
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CBLS vs. DWAT — Risk / Return Rank
CBLS
DWAT
CBLS vs. DWAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Changebridge Capital Long/Short Equity ETF (CBLS) and Arrow DWA Tactical: Macro ETF (DWAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CBLS | DWAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.38 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.94 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.71 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.61 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CBLS | DWAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.38 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | — | — |
Drawdowns
CBLS vs. DWAT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CBLS drawdown since its inception was -32.78%, which is greater than DWAT's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBLS and DWAT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CBLS | DWAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.78% | 0.00% | -32.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.15% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.27% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.24% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.80% | 0.00% | -12.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.34% | — | — |
Volatility
CBLS vs. DWAT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CBLS | DWAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.08% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.62% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.29% | 0.00% | +15.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.64% | 0.00% | +15.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.13% | 0.00% | +16.13% |
CBLS vs. DWAT - Expense Ratio Comparison
CBLS has a 1.95% expense ratio, which is higher than DWAT's 1.83% expense ratio.
Dividends
CBLS vs. DWAT - Dividend Comparison
CBLS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.72%, while DWAT has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CBLS Changebridge Capital Long/Short Equity ETF | 0.72% | 0.90% | 0.73% | 0.44% |
DWAT Arrow DWA Tactical: Macro ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, DWAT is cheaper at 1.83% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DWAT is cheaper with a 1.83% expense ratio, compared with 1.95% for CBLS.
CBLS has the higher dividend yield at 0.72%, compared with 0.00% for DWAT.
CBLS is categorized as Long-Short, while DWAT is Tactical Allocation. They also come from different issuers: Changebridge Capital LLC and Arrow Funds. Their fees differ too: 1.95% for CBLS and 1.83% for DWAT.
Find the right allocation for CBLS and DWAT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer