CBLDX vs. LFLIX

Last updated Jun 20, 2026

CBLDX (CrossingBridge Low Duration High Yield Fund) and LFLIX (BrandywineGLOBAL - Flexible Bond Fund) are both Multisector Bonds funds. Over the past 5 years, CBLDX returned 5.22%/yr vs 2.34%/yr for LFLIX. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CBLDX charges 0.88%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for LFLIX.

Performance

CBLDX vs. LFLIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CrossingBridge Low Duration High Yield Fund (CBLDX) and BrandywineGLOBAL - Flexible Bond Fund (LFLIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CBLDX achieves a 1.83% return, which is significantly lower than LFLIX's 3.03% return.

CBLDX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.45%
• YTD: 1.83%
• 6M: 2.29%
• 1Y: 4.95%
• 3Y*: 6.49%
• 5Y*: 5.22%
• 10Y*: —

LFLIX

• 1D: -0.21%
• 1M: 1.49%
• YTD: 3.03%
• 6M: 3.59%
• 1Y: 8.28%
• 3Y*: 6.56%
• 5Y*: 2.34%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CBLDX vs. LFLIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
CBLDX CrossingBridge Low Duration High Yield Fund	1.83%	6.04%	7.11%	7.71%	0.66%	7.44%	3.59%	3.50%	1.67%
LFLIX BrandywineGLOBAL - Flexible Bond Fund	3.03%	8.82%	2.95%	9.57%	-10.87%	1.05%	15.00%	10.84%	-2.64%

Correlation

The correlation between CBLDX and LFLIX is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.30
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.27
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.24
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2018	0.24

Return for Risk

CBLDX vs. LFLIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CBLDX

CBLDX Risk / Return Rank: 98
CBLDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
CBLDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
CBLDX Omega Ratio Rank: 98
CBLDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
CBLDX Martin Ratio Rank: 98

LFLIX

LFLIX Risk / Return Rank: 64
LFLIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
LFLIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
LFLIX Omega Ratio Rank: 65
LFLIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
LFLIX Martin Ratio Rank: 58

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CBLDX vs. LFLIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CrossingBridge Low Duration High Yield Fund (CBLDX) and BrandywineGLOBAL - Flexible Bond Fund (LFLIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CBLDX	LFLIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.56	2.04	+1.51
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	5.27	3.10	+2.16
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	2.07	1.40	+0.67
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.84	3.10	+3.75
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	27.18	10.72	+16.46

CBLDX vs. LFLIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CBLDX Sharpe Ratio is 3.56, which is higher than the LFLIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CBLDX and LFLIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CBLDX vs. LFLIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CBLDX drawdown since its inception was -8.15%, smaller than the maximum LFLIX drawdown of -16.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBLDX and LFLIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	CBLDX	LFLIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.15%	-16.73%	+8.58%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.73%	-2.72%	+1.99%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-1.05%	-7.54%	+6.49%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-1.88%	-16.73%	+14.85%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.10%	-0.52%	+0.42%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.31%	-2.85%	+2.54%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.18%	0.78%	-0.60%

Volatility

CBLDX vs. LFLIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for CrossingBridge Low Duration High Yield Fund (CBLDX) is 0.33%, while BrandywineGLOBAL - Flexible Bond Fund (LFLIX) has a volatility of 1.42%. This indicates that CBLDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LFLIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CBLDX	LFLIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.33%	1.42%	-1.09%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.14%	3.47%	-2.33%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.40%	4.13%	-2.73%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	1.59%	5.74%	-4.15%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	1.82%	5.09%	-3.27%

CBLDX vs. LFLIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CBLDX has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is higher than LFLIX's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

CBLDX vs. LFLIX - Dividend Comparison

CBLDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.22%, less than LFLIX's 6.93% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CBLDX CrossingBridge Low Duration High Yield Fund	6.22%	6.43%	7.12%	7.65%	5.07%	5.13%	3.97%	2.85%	2.18%	0.00%
LFLIX BrandywineGLOBAL - Flexible Bond Fund	6.93%	6.67%	8.94%	5.36%	3.28%	2.90%	3.62%	6.04%	3.67%	3.06%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CBLDX and LFLIX in my portfolio?

CBLDX and LFLIX have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CBLDX or LFLIX?

LFLIX has higher volatility (1.42%) compared to CBLDX (0.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CBLDX dropped -8.15% vs LFLIX's -16.73%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CBLDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.56 vs 2.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.