CBIL.TO vs. HBNK.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CBIL.TO (Global X 0-3 Month T-Bill ETF) and HBNK.TO (Global X Equal Weight Banks Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CBIL.TO is a Canadian Government Bonds fund actively managed by Global X, while HBNK.TO is a Financials Equities fund tracking the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks Index. CBIL.TO is actively managed, while HBNK.TO is passively managed. Over the past year, CBIL.TO returned 2.34% vs 60.09% for HBNK.TO. At a 0.00 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CBIL.TO charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for HBNK.TO.

Performance

CBIL.TO vs. HBNK.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X 0-3 Month T-Bill ETF (CBIL.TO) and Global X Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (HBNK.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CBIL.TO achieves a 0.85% return, which is significantly lower than HBNK.TO's 18.85% return.

CBIL.TO

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.20%
• YTD: 0.85%
• 6M: 1.08%
• 1Y: 2.34%
• 3Y*: 3.63%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

HBNK.TO

• 1D: -0.88%
• 1M: 5.21%
• YTD: 18.85%
• 6M: 24.41%
• 1Y: 60.09%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CBIL.TO vs. HBNK.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
CBIL.TO Global X 0-3 Month T-Bill ETF	0.85%	2.68%	4.47%	2.43%
HBNK.TO Global X Equal Weight Banks Index ETF	18.85%	43.71%	24.77%	8.99%

Correlation

The correlation between CBIL.TO and HBNK.TO is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.05
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2023	0.00

Return for Risk

CBIL.TO vs. HBNK.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CBIL.TO

CBIL.TO Risk / Return Rank: 99
CBIL.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
CBIL.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
CBIL.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 99
CBIL.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
CBIL.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 100

HBNK.TO

HBNK.TO Risk / Return Rank: 96
HBNK.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
HBNK.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
HBNK.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 97
HBNK.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
HBNK.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CBIL.TO vs. HBNK.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X 0-3 Month T-Bill ETF (CBIL.TO) and Global X Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (HBNK.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CBIL.TO	HBNK.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	9.47	4.77	+4.70
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	23.59	6.50	+17.09
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	5.38	1.88	+3.50
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	58.74	7.13	+51.61
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	339.60	30.99	+308.62
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CBIL.TO vs. HBNK.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CBIL.TO Sharpe Ratio is 9.47, which is higher than the HBNK.TO Sharpe Ratio of 4.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CBIL.TO and HBNK.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CBIL.TO	HBNK.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.47	4.77	+4.70
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	11.64	2.66	+8.97

Drawdowns

CBIL.TO vs. HBNK.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CBIL.TO drawdown since its inception was -0.06%, smaller than the maximum HBNK.TO drawdown of -14.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBIL.TO and HBNK.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	CBIL.TO	HBNK.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-0.06%	-14.78%	+14.72%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.04%	-8.48%	+8.44%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-0.06%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-2.30%	+2.30%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.00%	-2.33%	+2.33%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.01%	1.95%	-1.94%

Volatility

CBIL.TO vs. HBNK.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X 0-3 Month T-Bill ETF (CBIL.TO) is 0.08%, while Global X Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (HBNK.TO) has a volatility of 5.00%. This indicates that CBIL.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HBNK.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CBIL.TO	HBNK.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.08%	5.00%	-4.92%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.19%	11.26%	-11.07%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.25%	12.67%	-12.42%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.31%	12.70%	-12.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.31%	12.70%	-12.39%

CBIL.TO vs. HBNK.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

CBIL.TO has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than HBNK.TO's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

CBIL.TO vs. HBNK.TO - Dividend Comparison

CBIL.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.29%, less than HBNK.TO's 2.82% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
CBIL.TO Global X 0-3 Month T-Bill ETF	2.29%	2.59%	4.38%	3.39%
HBNK.TO Global X Equal Weight Banks Index ETF	2.82%	3.24%	4.15%	2.45%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CBIL.TO and HBNK.TO in my portfolio?

CBIL.TO and HBNK.TO have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CBIL.TO or HBNK.TO?

On fees, HBNK.TO is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CBIL.TO or HBNK.TO?

HBNK.TO is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for CBIL.TO.

What is the main difference between CBIL.TO and HBNK.TO?

CBIL.TO is categorized as Canadian Government Bonds, while HBNK.TO is Financials Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for CBIL.TO and 0.09% for HBNK.TO.