CBH.TO vs. XUS.TO
CBH.TO (iShares 1-10 Year Laddered Corporate Bond Index ETF) and XUS.TO (iShares Core S&P 500 Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CBH.TO is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Morningstar Can Corp Bd GR CAD, while XUS.TO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CBH.TO returned 2.41%/yr vs 15.98%/yr for XUS.TO. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CBH.TO charges 0.28%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for XUS.TO.
Performance
CBH.TO vs. XUS.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CBH.TO achieves a 1.29% return, which is significantly lower than XUS.TO's 12.21% return. Over the past 10 years, CBH.TO has underperformed XUS.TO with an annualized return of 2.41%, while XUS.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.98% annualized return.
CBH.TO
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 1.18%
- YTD
- 1.29%
- 6M
- 1.13%
- 1Y
- 3.64%
- 3Y*
- 5.45%
- 5Y*
- 2.17%
- 10Y*
- 2.41%
XUS.TO
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- 7.22%
- YTD
- 12.21%
- 6M
- 10.39%
- 1Y
- 29.30%
- 3Y*
- 23.52%
- 5Y*
- 16.78%
- 10Y*
- 15.98%
CBH.TO vs. XUS.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CBH.TO iShares 1-10 Year Laddered Corporate Bond Index ETF | 1.29% | 4.60% | 6.19% | 6.48% | -6.85% | -2.08% | 7.99% | 5.62% | 0.92% | 0.65% |
XUS.TO iShares Core S&P 500 Index ETF | 12.21% | 12.19% | 35.16% | 23.31% | -12.59% | 27.20% | 15.56% | 24.57% | 3.31% | 13.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between CBH.TO and XUS.TO is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 16, 2013 | 0.03 |
Over the past year, CBH.TO and XUS.TO have become more correlated (0.26) than their long-term average of 0.03, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CBH.TO vs. XUS.TO — Risk / Return Rank
CBH.TO
XUS.TO
CBH.TO vs. XUS.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares 1-10 Year Laddered Corporate Bond Index ETF (CBH.TO) and iShares Core S&P 500 Index ETF (XUS.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CBH.TO | XUS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.47 | -0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.71 | 3.41 | -1.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.14 | 12.94 | -7.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CBH.TO | XUS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.19 | 2.55 | -1.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 | 1.13 | -0.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.37 | 0.98 | -0.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.51 | 1.08 | -0.57 |
Drawdowns
CBH.TO vs. XUS.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CBH.TO drawdown since its inception was -16.36%, smaller than the maximum XUS.TO drawdown of -27.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBH.TO and XUS.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CBH.TO | XUS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.36% | -27.23% | +10.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.14% | -8.63% | +6.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -2.14% | -18.96% | +16.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -10.50% | -21.85% | +11.35% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -16.36% | -27.23% | +10.87% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.31% | -0.31% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.83% | -3.46% | +1.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.71% | 2.27% | -1.56% |
Volatility
CBH.TO vs. XUS.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares 1-10 Year Laddered Corporate Bond Index ETF (CBH.TO) is 1.07%, while iShares Core S&P 500 Index ETF (XUS.TO) has a volatility of 3.19%. This indicates that CBH.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XUS.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CBH.TO | XUS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.07% | 3.19% | -2.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.28% | 8.66% | -6.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.07% | 11.58% | -8.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.02% | 14.92% | -10.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.47% | 16.48% | -10.01% |
CBH.TO vs. XUS.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
CBH.TO has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is higher than XUS.TO's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
CBH.TO vs. XUS.TO - Dividend Comparison
CBH.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.36%, more than XUS.TO's 1.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CBH.TO iShares 1-10 Year Laddered Corporate Bond Index ETF | 3.36% | 3.32% | 3.21% | 3.28% | 3.17% | 2.91% | 2.92% | 3.33% | 3.65% | 3.82% | 3.86% | 3.90% |
XUS.TO iShares Core S&P 500 Index ETF | 1.12% | 1.26% | 1.03% | 1.22% | 1.38% | 0.99% | 1.35% | 2.02% | 1.77% | 1.48% | 1.66% | 1.70% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CBH.TO and XUS.TO have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XUS.TO is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XUS.TO is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for CBH.TO.
CBH.TO is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while XUS.TO is S&P 500. CBH.TO tracks Morningstar Can Corp Bd GR CAD, while XUS.TO tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for CBH.TO and 0.09% for XUS.TO.
Find the right allocation for CBH.TO and XUS.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer