CBH.TO vs. XGRO.TO
CBH.TO (iShares 1-10 Year Laddered Corporate Bond Index ETF) and XGRO.TO (iShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio) are both exchange-traded funds - CBH.TO is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Morningstar Can Corp Bd GR CAD, while XGRO.TO is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by iShares. CBH.TO is passively managed, while XGRO.TO is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, CBH.TO returned 2.41%/yr vs 10.20%/yr for XGRO.TO. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CBH.TO charges 0.28%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for XGRO.TO.
Performance
CBH.TO vs. XGRO.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CBH.TO achieves a 1.29% return, which is significantly lower than XGRO.TO's 10.38% return. Over the past 10 years, CBH.TO has underperformed XGRO.TO with an annualized return of 2.41%, while XGRO.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 10.20% annualized return.
CBH.TO
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 1.18%
- YTD
- 1.29%
- 6M
- 1.13%
- 1Y
- 3.64%
- 3Y*
- 5.45%
- 5Y*
- 2.17%
- 10Y*
- 2.41%
XGRO.TO
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- 5.42%
- YTD
- 10.38%
- 6M
- 8.74%
- 1Y
- 23.44%
- 3Y*
- 17.87%
- 5Y*
- 10.83%
- 10Y*
- 10.20%
CBH.TO vs. XGRO.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CBH.TO iShares 1-10 Year Laddered Corporate Bond Index ETF | 1.29% | 4.60% | 6.19% | 6.48% | -6.85% | -2.08% | 7.99% | 5.62% | 0.92% | 0.65% |
XGRO.TO iShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio | 10.38% | 15.59% | 19.53% | 15.01% | -11.08% | 14.29% | 11.51% | 17.97% | -6.73% | 11.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between CBH.TO and XGRO.TO is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 26, 2011 | 0.06 |
Over the past year, CBH.TO and XGRO.TO have become more correlated (0.32) than their long-term average of 0.06, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CBH.TO vs. XGRO.TO — Risk / Return Rank
CBH.TO
XGRO.TO
CBH.TO vs. XGRO.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares 1-10 Year Laddered Corporate Bond Index ETF (CBH.TO) and iShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio (XGRO.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CBH.TO | XGRO.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.99 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.41 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.71 | 3.30 | -1.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.14 | 14.67 | -9.53 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CBH.TO | XGRO.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.19 | 2.18 | -0.99 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 | 0.99 | -0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.37 | 0.84 | -0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.51 | 0.35 | +0.16 |
Drawdowns
CBH.TO vs. XGRO.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CBH.TO drawdown since its inception was -16.36%, smaller than the maximum XGRO.TO drawdown of -47.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBH.TO and XGRO.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CBH.TO | XGRO.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.36% | -47.97% | +31.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.14% | -7.12% | +4.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -2.14% | -12.47% | +10.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -10.50% | -18.40% | +7.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -16.36% | -25.85% | +9.49% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.31% | -0.18% | -0.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.83% | -8.49% | +6.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.71% | 1.60% | -0.89% |
Volatility
CBH.TO vs. XGRO.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares 1-10 Year Laddered Corporate Bond Index ETF (CBH.TO) is 1.07%, while iShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio (XGRO.TO) has a volatility of 3.43%. This indicates that CBH.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XGRO.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CBH.TO | XGRO.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.07% | 3.43% | -2.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.28% | 9.19% | -6.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.07% | 10.78% | -7.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.02% | 11.05% | -7.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.47% | 12.26% | -5.79% |
CBH.TO vs. XGRO.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
CBH.TO has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is higher than XGRO.TO's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
CBH.TO vs. XGRO.TO - Dividend Comparison
CBH.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.36%, more than XGRO.TO's 1.76% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CBH.TO iShares 1-10 Year Laddered Corporate Bond Index ETF | 3.36% | 3.32% | 3.21% | 3.28% | 3.17% | 2.91% | 2.92% | 3.33% | 3.65% | 3.82% | 3.86% | 3.90% |
XGRO.TO iShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio | 1.76% | 1.92% | 1.98% | 2.22% | 1.86% | 1.66% | 1.94% | 2.21% | 7.42% | 2.04% | 2.65% | 2.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CBH.TO and XGRO.TO have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XGRO.TO is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XGRO.TO is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for CBH.TO.
CBH.TO is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while XGRO.TO is Diversified Portfolio. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for CBH.TO and 0.20% for XGRO.TO.
Find the right allocation for CBH.TO and XGRO.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer