PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CBFAX vs. RAPZX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CBFAX vs. RAPZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds Global Balanced Fund (CBFAX) and Cohen & Steers Real Assets Fund Inc (RAPZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CBFAX achieves a 6.37% return, which is significantly lower than RAPZX's 13.68% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with CBFAX having a 6.75% annualized return and RAPZX not far behind at 6.62%.


CBFAX

1D
1.12%
1M
0.28%
6M
3.85%
YTD
6.37%
1Y
13.81%
3Y*
11.28%
5Y*
5.73%
10Y*
6.75%
ALL TIME*
6.50%

RAPZX

1D
0.49%
1M
3.52%
6M
6.70%
YTD
13.68%
1Y
17.19%
3Y*
10.24%
5Y*
7.13%
10Y*
6.62%
ALL TIME*
4.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

CBFAX vs. RAPZX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CBFAX
American Funds Global Balanced Fund
6.37%17.10%6.50%13.69%-14.29%9.14%10.45%17.22%-6.18%13.96%
RAPZX
Cohen & Steers Real Assets Fund Inc
13.68%11.96%4.35%3.88%-2.05%23.51%-0.84%17.77%-8.44%6.51%

Correlation

The correlation between CBFAX and RAPZX is 0.50, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.66

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2013

0.74

Over the past year, the correlation between CBFAX and RAPZX has dropped to 0.50 - well below their long-term average of 0.74, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CBFAX vs. RAPZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CBFAX
CBFAX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
CBFAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBFAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBFAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
CBFAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBFAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

RAPZX
RAPZX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
RAPZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RAPZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
RAPZX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
RAPZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
RAPZX Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CBFAX vs. RAPZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds Global Balanced Fund (CBFAX) and Cohen & Steers Real Assets Fund Inc (RAPZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CBFAXRAPZXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.31

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.97

2.62

-0.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.21

7.36

+0.85

CBFAX vs. RAPZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CBFAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is comparable to the RAPZX Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CBFAX and RAPZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CBFAX vs. RAPZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CBFAX drawdown since its inception was -23.35%, smaller than the maximum RAPZX drawdown of -30.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBFAX and RAPZX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CBFAXRAPZXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.35%

-30.69%

+7.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.73%

-6.26%

-0.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.90%

-8.84%

-0.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.56%

-19.31%

-3.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.35%

-30.69%

+7.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.54%

-2.14%

+1.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.68%

-8.01%

+4.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.61%

2.23%

-0.62%

Volatility

CBFAX vs. RAPZX - Volatility Comparison

American Funds Global Balanced Fund (CBFAX) has a higher volatility of 2.15% compared to Cohen & Steers Real Assets Fund Inc (RAPZX) at 2.03%. This indicates that CBFAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RAPZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CBFAXRAPZXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.15%

2.03%

+0.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.34%

6.98%

+0.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.70%

10.38%

-1.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.98%

12.77%

-2.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.40%

12.72%

-2.32%

CBFAX vs. RAPZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CBFAX has a 0.84% expense ratio, which is higher than RAPZX's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

CBFAX vs. RAPZX - Dividend Comparison

CBFAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.81%, more than RAPZX's 1.22% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CBFAX
American Funds Global Balanced Fund
5.81%6.32%5.50%1.58%1.49%6.01%1.21%1.83%2.25%3.11%1.93%3.20%
RAPZX
Cohen & Steers Real Assets Fund Inc
1.22%1.44%3.20%2.71%3.08%9.61%1.71%2.85%2.06%1.76%2.83%2.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CBFAX and RAPZX have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CBFAX has higher volatility (2.15%) compared to RAPZX (2.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CBFAX dropped -23.35% vs RAPZX's -30.69%.

RAPZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CBFAX and RAPZX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer