PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CBFAX vs. MHESX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CBFAX vs. MHESX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds Global Balanced Fund (CBFAX) and MH Elite Select Portfolio of Funds Fund (MHESX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CBFAX achieves a 6.95% return, which is significantly lower than MHESX's 9.33% return. Over the past 10 years, CBFAX has outperformed MHESX with an annualized return of 7.04%, while MHESX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.38% annualized return.


CBFAX

1D
0.56%
1M
2.83%
YTD
6.95%
6M
7.45%
1Y
17.65%
3Y*
12.83%
5Y*
6.08%
10Y*
7.04%

MHESX

1D
0.28%
1M
3.17%
YTD
9.33%
6M
11.54%
1Y
23.49%
3Y*
11.34%
5Y*
1.58%
10Y*
5.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CBFAX vs. MHESX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CBFAX
American Funds Global Balanced Fund
6.95%17.10%6.50%13.69%-14.29%9.14%10.45%17.22%-6.18%13.96%
MHESX
MH Elite Select Portfolio of Funds Fund
9.33%17.63%0.77%12.54%-26.14%6.62%20.24%20.22%-17.04%21.72%

Correlation

The correlation between CBFAX and MHESX is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.44

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2011

0.81

Over the past year, the correlation between CBFAX and MHESX has dropped to 0.49 - well below their long-term average of 0.81, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CBFAX vs. MHESX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CBFAX
CBFAX Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
CBFAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBFAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBFAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
CBFAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBFAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

MHESX
MHESX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
MHESX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MHESX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
MHESX Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
MHESX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
MHESX Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CBFAX vs. MHESX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds Global Balanced Fund (CBFAX) and MH Elite Select Portfolio of Funds Fund (MHESX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CBFAXMHESXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.42

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.65

2.81

-0.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.64

10.62

+1.02

CBFAX vs. MHESX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CBFAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.18, which is comparable to the MHESX Sharpe Ratio of 2.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CBFAX and MHESX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CBFAXMHESXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.18

2.23

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

0.11

+0.51

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

0.36

+0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

0.21

+0.44

Drawdowns

CBFAX vs. MHESX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CBFAX drawdown since its inception was -23.35%, smaller than the maximum MHESX drawdown of -46.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBFAX and MHESX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CBFAXMHESXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.35%

-46.01%

+22.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.73%

-8.64%

+1.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.90%

-19.47%

+10.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.56%

-36.05%

+13.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.35%

-36.05%

+12.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.70%

-11.68%

+7.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.53%

2.26%

-0.73%

Volatility

CBFAX vs. MHESX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Funds Global Balanced Fund (CBFAX) is 2.71%, while MH Elite Select Portfolio of Funds Fund (MHESX) has a volatility of 3.20%. This indicates that CBFAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MHESX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CBFAXMHESXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.71%

3.20%

-0.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.80%

8.76%

-1.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.19%

10.89%

-2.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.91%

15.18%

-5.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.46%

14.84%

-4.38%

CBFAX vs. MHESX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CBFAX has a 0.84% expense ratio, which is higher than MHESX's 0.21% expense ratio.


Dividends

CBFAX vs. MHESX - Dividend Comparison

CBFAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.93%, while MHESX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CBFAX
American Funds Global Balanced Fund
5.93%6.32%5.50%1.58%1.49%6.01%1.21%1.83%2.25%3.11%1.93%3.20%
MHESX
MH Elite Select Portfolio of Funds Fund
0.00%0.00%0.94%0.20%6.43%4.56%4.72%1.74%0.75%2.41%3.16%2.85%

Frequently Asked Questions


CBFAX and MHESX have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MHESX has higher volatility (3.20%) compared to CBFAX (2.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CBFAX dropped -23.35% vs MHESX's -46.01%.

MHESX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 2.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CBFAX and MHESX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer