CBCX.TO vs. LONG.TO
CBCX.TO (CI Galaxy Blockchain Index ETF CAD) and LONG.TO (CI Global Longevity Economy Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - CBCX.TO is a Blockchain fund tracking the Alerian Galaxy Global Cryptocurrency-Focused Blockchain Technology NTR Hedged (CAD), while LONG.TO is a Health & Biotech Equities fund actively managed by CI. CBCX.TO is passively managed, while LONG.TO is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, CBCX.TO returned 29.40%/yr vs 16.52%/yr for LONG.TO. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CBCX.TO vs. LONG.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CBCX.TO achieves a -6.79% return, which is significantly lower than LONG.TO's 7.98% return.
CBCX.TO
- 1D
- -7.15%
- 1M
- -19.77%
- 6M
- -19.39%
- YTD
- -6.79%
- 1Y
- -0.87%
- 3Y*
- 29.40%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LONG.TO
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 1.17%
- 6M
- 6.88%
- YTD
- 7.98%
- 1Y
- 21.09%
- 3Y*
- 16.52%
- 5Y*
- 10.47%
- 10Y*
- —
CBCX.TO vs. LONG.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CBCX.TO CI Galaxy Blockchain Index ETF CAD | -6.79% | 21.63% | 82.92% | 108.11% | -46.10% |
LONG.TO CI Global Longevity Economy Fund | 7.98% | 6.19% | 25.86% | 19.50% | 2.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between CBCX.TO and LONG.TO is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 9, 2022 | 0.12 |
The correlation between CBCX.TO and LONG.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (all time) to 0.22 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CBCX.TO vs. LONG.TO — Risk / Return Rank
CBCX.TO
LONG.TO
CBCX.TO vs. LONG.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Galaxy Blockchain Index ETF CAD (CBCX.TO) and CI Global Longevity Economy Fund (LONG.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CBCX.TO | LONG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.22 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.02 | 1.28 | -1.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.03 | 4.55 | -4.58 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CBCX.TO vs. LONG.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CBCX.TO drawdown since its inception was -55.21%, which is greater than LONG.TO's maximum drawdown of -23.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBCX.TO and LONG.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CBCX.TO | LONG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.21% | -23.65% | -31.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -54.19% | -16.39% | -37.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -55.21% | -22.45% | -32.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -23.65% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -43.31% | -2.87% | -40.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.09% | -5.64% | -18.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 31.67% | 4.61% | +27.06% |
Volatility
CBCX.TO vs. LONG.TO - Volatility Comparison
CI Galaxy Blockchain Index ETF CAD (CBCX.TO) has a higher volatility of 13.91% compared to CI Global Longevity Economy Fund (LONG.TO) at 7.03%. This indicates that CBCX.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LONG.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CBCX.TO | LONG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.91% | 7.03% | +6.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 42.35% | 14.80% | +27.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 60.89% | 17.62% | +43.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 62.52% | 17.56% | +44.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 62.52% | 17.80% | +44.72% |
Dividends
CBCX.TO vs. LONG.TO - Dividend Comparison
CBCX.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, while LONG.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CBCX.TO CI Galaxy Blockchain Index ETF CAD | 0.03% | 0.14% | 0.13% | 0.06% |
LONG.TO CI Global Longevity Economy Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.33% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CBCX.TO and LONG.TO have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CBCX.TO is categorized as Blockchain, while LONG.TO is Health & Biotech Equities.
Find the right allocation for CBCX.TO and LONG.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer