PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CBAAX vs. FSIRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CBAAX vs. FSIRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds Moderate Growth and Income Portfolio (CBAAX) and Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class I (FSIRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CBAAX achieves a 6.66% return, which is significantly lower than FSIRX's 7.04% return. Over the past 10 years, CBAAX has outperformed FSIRX with an annualized return of 8.82%, while FSIRX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.47% annualized return.


CBAAX

1D
1.10%
1M
-0.61%
6M
4.04%
YTD
6.66%
1Y
14.78%
3Y*
12.97%
5Y*
7.20%
10Y*
8.82%
ALL TIME*
9.04%

FSIRX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.75%
6M
3.41%
YTD
7.04%
1Y
13.22%
3Y*
8.16%
5Y*
5.54%
10Y*
5.47%
ALL TIME*
4.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

CBAAX vs. FSIRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CBAAX
American Funds Moderate Growth and Income Portfolio
6.66%16.62%11.27%13.82%-13.58%13.79%13.20%19.42%-4.63%16.65%
FSIRX
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class I
7.04%10.38%5.83%4.58%-3.34%15.89%3.72%10.55%-3.99%4.10%

Correlation

The correlation between CBAAX and FSIRX is 0.42, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.65

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2012

0.59

The correlation between CBAAX and FSIRX shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (1 year) to 0.65 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CBAAX vs. FSIRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CBAAX
CBAAX Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
CBAAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBAAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBAAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
CBAAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBAAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

FSIRX
FSIRX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
FSIRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSIRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSIRX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
FSIRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSIRX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CBAAX vs. FSIRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds Moderate Growth and Income Portfolio (CBAAX) and Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class I (FSIRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CBAAXFSIRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.49

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.89

3.61

-1.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.18

11.63

-3.45

CBAAX vs. FSIRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CBAAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is lower than the FSIRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CBAAX and FSIRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CBAAX vs. FSIRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CBAAX drawdown since its inception was -23.16%, smaller than the maximum FSIRX drawdown of -33.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBAAX and FSIRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CBAAXFSIRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.16%

-33.39%

+10.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.31%

-3.53%

-3.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.62%

-5.81%

-4.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.72%

-12.82%

-7.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.16%

-19.98%

-3.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.12%

-2.28%

+1.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.91%

-4.15%

+1.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.68%

1.09%

+0.59%

Volatility

CBAAX vs. FSIRX - Volatility Comparison

American Funds Moderate Growth and Income Portfolio (CBAAX) has a higher volatility of 2.31% compared to Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class I (FSIRX) at 1.75%. This indicates that CBAAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSIRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CBAAXFSIRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.31%

1.75%

+0.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.46%

3.98%

+3.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.11%

5.07%

+4.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.48%

6.93%

+3.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.80%

6.75%

+4.05%

CBAAX vs. FSIRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CBAAX has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than FSIRX's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

CBAAX vs. FSIRX - Dividend Comparison

CBAAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.54%, more than FSIRX's 3.23% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CBAAX
American Funds Moderate Growth and Income Portfolio
5.54%5.81%3.56%2.26%5.97%4.95%2.54%3.80%4.65%3.43%3.59%3.59%
FSIRX
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class I
3.23%4.72%4.80%5.28%7.33%5.37%2.23%3.09%9.42%2.63%2.37%1.75%

Frequently Asked Questions


CBAAX and FSIRX have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CBAAX has higher volatility (2.31%) compared to FSIRX (1.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CBAAX dropped -23.16% vs FSIRX's -33.39%.

FSIRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CBAAX and FSIRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer