CBAAX vs. AWSHX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CBAAX (American Funds Moderate Growth and Income Portfolio) and AWSHX (American Funds Washington Mutual Investors Fund Class A) are both mutual funds - CBAAX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by American Funds, while AWSHX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by American Funds. Over the past 10 years, CBAAX returned 9.17%/yr vs 12.84%/yr for AWSHX. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CBAAX charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for AWSHX.

Performance

CBAAX vs. AWSHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds Moderate Growth and Income Portfolio (CBAAX) and American Funds Washington Mutual Investors Fund Class A (AWSHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CBAAX achieves a 7.59% return, which is significantly higher than AWSHX's 5.89% return. Over the past 10 years, CBAAX has underperformed AWSHX with an annualized return of 9.17%, while AWSHX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.84% annualized return.

CBAAX

• 1D: 0.33%
• 1M: 3.23%
• YTD: 7.59%
• 6M: 8.19%
• 1Y: 19.33%
• 3Y*: 14.81%
• 5Y*: 7.66%
• 10Y*: 9.17%

AWSHX

• 1D: 0.39%
• 1M: 2.81%
• YTD: 5.89%
• 6M: 6.02%
• 1Y: 17.56%
• 3Y*: 18.25%
• 5Y*: 11.92%
• 10Y*: 12.84%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CBAAX vs. AWSHX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CBAAX American Funds Moderate Growth and Income Portfolio	7.59%	16.62%	11.27%	13.82%	-13.58%	13.79%	13.20%	19.42%	-4.63%	16.65%
AWSHX American Funds Washington Mutual Investors Fund Class A	5.89%	17.20%	19.02%	17.21%	-8.45%	28.44%	7.69%	24.86%	-6.16%	20.03%

Correlation

The correlation between CBAAX and AWSHX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.93
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.94
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.94
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2012	0.93

The correlation between CBAAX and AWSHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

CBAAX vs. AWSHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CBAAX

CBAAX Risk / Return Rank: 60
CBAAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
CBAAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
CBAAX Omega Ratio Rank: 64
CBAAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
CBAAX Martin Ratio Rank: 61

AWSHX

AWSHX Risk / Return Rank: 38
AWSHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
AWSHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
AWSHX Omega Ratio Rank: 37
AWSHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
AWSHX Martin Ratio Rank: 45

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CBAAX vs. AWSHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds Moderate Growth and Income Portfolio (CBAAX) and American Funds Washington Mutual Investors Fund Class A (AWSHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CBAAX	AWSHX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.34	1.78	+0.56
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.32	2.53	+0.79
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	1.32	+0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.71	2.19	+0.52
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.13	9.46	+2.67
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CBAAX vs. AWSHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CBAAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.34, which is higher than the AWSHX Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CBAAX and AWSHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CBAAX	AWSHX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.34	1.78	+0.56
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.74	0.85	-0.11
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.85	0.79	+0.06
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.91	0.63	+0.28

Drawdowns

CBAAX vs. AWSHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CBAAX drawdown since its inception was -23.16%, smaller than the maximum AWSHX drawdown of -53.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBAAX and AWSHX.

Drawdown Indicators

	CBAAX	AWSHX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.16%	-53.95%	+30.79%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.31%	-8.37%	+1.06%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.62%	-14.66%	+4.04%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.72%	-18.64%	-2.08%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-23.16%	-34.65%	+11.49%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.93%	-6.41%	+3.48%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.63%	1.93%	-0.30%

Volatility

CBAAX vs. AWSHX - Volatility Comparison

American Funds Moderate Growth and Income Portfolio (CBAAX) has a higher volatility of 2.62% compared to American Funds Washington Mutual Investors Fund Class A (AWSHX) at 2.41%. This indicates that CBAAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AWSHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CBAAX	AWSHX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.62%	2.41%	+0.21%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.83%	7.89%	-1.06%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.47%	10.31%	-1.84%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.39%	14.10%	-3.71%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.81%	16.33%	-5.52%

CBAAX vs. AWSHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CBAAX has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than AWSHX's 0.58% expense ratio.

Dividends

CBAAX vs. AWSHX - Dividend Comparison

CBAAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.40%, less than AWSHX's 9.55% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AWSHX American Funds Washington Mutual Investors Fund Class A	9.55%	10.08%	10.06%	6.14%	6.31%	6.05%	3.06%	6.19%	4.36%	7.26%	6.37%	6.25%
CBAAX American Funds Moderate Growth and Income Portfolio	5.40%	5.81%	3.56%	2.26%	5.97%	4.95%	2.54%	3.80%	4.65%	3.43%	3.59%	3.59%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CBAAX and AWSHX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, CBAAX and AWSHX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, CBAAX or AWSHX?

CBAAX has higher volatility (2.62%) compared to AWSHX (2.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CBAAX dropped -23.16% vs AWSHX's -53.95%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CBAAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 1.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.