PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CAXAX vs. VMVFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CAXAX vs. VMVFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Catalyst/MAP Global Equity Fund (CAXAX) and Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility Fund Investor Shares (VMVFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CAXAX achieves a 10.39% return, which is significantly higher than VMVFX's 8.88% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with CAXAX having a 9.50% annualized return and VMVFX not far behind at 9.17%.


CAXAX

1D
0.19%
1M
-0.93%
6M
5.53%
YTD
10.39%
1Y
18.74%
3Y*
14.36%
5Y*
8.75%
10Y*
9.50%

VMVFX

1D
-0.35%
1M
0.29%
6M
6.71%
YTD
8.88%
1Y
13.26%
3Y*
13.32%
5Y*
10.35%
10Y*
9.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CAXAX vs. VMVFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CAXAX
Catalyst/MAP Global Equity Fund
10.39%22.46%7.62%10.71%-11.04%16.54%5.48%18.84%-3.19%17.11%
VMVFX
Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility Fund Investor Shares
8.88%12.74%13.38%7.82%-4.48%23.74%-3.99%23.28%-1.79%15.93%

Correlation

The correlation between CAXAX and VMVFX is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2013

0.80

The correlation between CAXAX and VMVFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (1 year) to 0.80 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CAXAX vs. VMVFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CAXAX
CAXAX Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
CAXAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CAXAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
CAXAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
CAXAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
CAXAX Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

VMVFX
VMVFX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
VMVFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VMVFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
VMVFX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
VMVFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
VMVFX Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CAXAX vs. VMVFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Catalyst/MAP Global Equity Fund (CAXAX) and Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility Fund Investor Shares (VMVFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CAXAXVMVFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.35

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.27

2.20

+0.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.64

8.50

-0.86

CAXAX vs. VMVFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CAXAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is comparable to the VMVFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CAXAX and VMVFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CAXAX vs. VMVFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CAXAX drawdown since its inception was -32.50%, roughly equal to the maximum VMVFX drawdown of -33.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAXAX and VMVFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CAXAXVMVFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.50%

-33.09%

+0.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.44%

-6.27%

-2.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.76%

-7.96%

-2.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.76%

-13.02%

-9.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.50%

-33.09%

+0.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.43%

-1.27%

-0.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.79%

-2.81%

-0.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.51%

1.62%

+0.89%

Volatility

CAXAX vs. VMVFX - Volatility Comparison

Catalyst/MAP Global Equity Fund (CAXAX) has a higher volatility of 3.08% compared to Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility Fund Investor Shares (VMVFX) at 2.02%. This indicates that CAXAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VMVFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CAXAXVMVFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.08%

2.02%

+1.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.36%

5.53%

+2.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.35%

7.02%

+3.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.36%

10.77%

+1.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.71%

12.43%

+1.28%

CAXAX vs. VMVFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CAXAX has a 1.21% expense ratio, which is higher than VMVFX's 0.21% expense ratio.


Dividends

CAXAX vs. VMVFX - Dividend Comparison

CAXAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.92%, less than VMVFX's 9.17% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CAXAX
Catalyst/MAP Global Equity Fund
5.92%6.53%8.29%2.38%0.00%1.75%1.78%4.67%9.90%2.88%1.57%1.18%
VMVFX
Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility Fund Investor Shares
9.17%9.98%3.77%3.05%4.96%12.73%2.02%5.12%7.27%2.30%2.71%3.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


CAXAX and VMVFX have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CAXAX has higher volatility (3.08%) compared to VMVFX (2.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CAXAX dropped -32.50% vs VMVFX's -33.09%.

VMVFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CAXAX and VMVFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer