PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CAVAX vs. SLCAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CAVAX vs. SLCAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SEI Catholic Values Trust Catholic Values Equity Fund (CAVAX) and SEI Institutional Investments Trust Large Cap Fund (SLCAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CAVAX achieves a 9.85% return, which is significantly lower than SLCAX's 11.22% return. Over the past 10 years, CAVAX has underperformed SLCAX with an annualized return of 12.15%, while SLCAX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.38% annualized return.


CAVAX

1D
0.49%
1M
4.43%
YTD
9.85%
6M
10.48%
1Y
22.45%
3Y*
18.11%
5Y*
9.18%
10Y*
12.15%

SLCAX

1D
0.14%
1M
4.28%
YTD
11.22%
6M
11.92%
1Y
27.43%
3Y*
20.92%
5Y*
11.99%
10Y*
13.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CAVAX vs. SLCAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CAVAX
SEI Catholic Values Trust Catholic Values Equity Fund
9.85%15.45%16.72%21.33%-18.51%20.57%17.33%26.63%-10.24%23.69%
SLCAX
SEI Institutional Investments Trust Large Cap Fund
11.22%17.94%20.89%18.93%-14.21%26.47%11.66%28.06%-6.91%20.99%

Correlation

The correlation between CAVAX and SLCAX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.97

The correlation between CAVAX and SLCAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CAVAX vs. SLCAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CAVAX
CAVAX Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
CAVAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CAVAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
CAVAX Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
CAVAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
CAVAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

SLCAX
SLCAX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
SLCAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLCAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLCAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
SLCAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLCAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CAVAX vs. SLCAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEI Catholic Values Trust Catholic Values Equity Fund (CAVAX) and SEI Institutional Investments Trust Large Cap Fund (SLCAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CAVAXSLCAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.46

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.74

3.50

-0.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.65

16.15

-4.50

CAVAX vs. SLCAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CAVAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.97, which is comparable to the SLCAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CAVAX and SLCAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CAVAXSLCAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.97

2.52

-0.55

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

0.58

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

0.67

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.69

0.45

+0.24

Drawdowns

CAVAX vs. SLCAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CAVAX drawdown since its inception was -36.55%, smaller than the maximum SLCAX drawdown of -56.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAVAX and SLCAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CAVAXSLCAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.55%

-56.24%

+19.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.49%

-8.08%

-0.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.95%

-22.33%

+4.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.51%

-33.95%

+7.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.55%

-35.87%

-0.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.06%

-10.57%

+5.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.99%

1.75%

+0.24%

Volatility

CAVAX vs. SLCAX - Volatility Comparison

SEI Catholic Values Trust Catholic Values Equity Fund (CAVAX) has a higher volatility of 2.91% compared to SEI Institutional Investments Trust Large Cap Fund (SLCAX) at 2.61%. This indicates that CAVAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SLCAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CAVAXSLCAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.91%

2.61%

+0.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.90%

8.60%

+0.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.81%

11.23%

+0.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.08%

20.79%

-4.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.39%

20.11%

-2.72%

CAVAX vs. SLCAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CAVAX has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is higher than SLCAX's 0.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

CAVAX vs. SLCAX - Dividend Comparison

CAVAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.13%, less than SLCAX's 33.73% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CAVAX
SEI Catholic Values Trust Catholic Values Equity Fund
6.13%6.73%7.01%1.29%3.67%16.58%2.98%2.80%5.66%0.71%0.99%0.00%
SLCAX
SEI Institutional Investments Trust Large Cap Fund
33.73%37.47%12.36%7.46%13.40%20.97%6.89%11.19%31.44%23.33%5.33%17.76%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, CAVAX and SLCAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

CAVAX has higher volatility (2.91%) compared to SLCAX (2.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CAVAX dropped -36.55% vs SLCAX's -56.24%.

SLCAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 1.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CAVAX and SLCAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer