PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CAUSX vs. VGIVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CAUSX vs. VGIVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Shelton Capital Management U.S. Government Securities Fund (CAUSX) and Vanguard Emerging Markets Government Bond Index Fund Institutional Shares (VGIVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CAUSX achieves a -0.27% return, which is significantly lower than VGIVX's 1.70% return. Over the past 10 years, CAUSX has underperformed VGIVX with an annualized return of 0.73%, while VGIVX has yielded a comparatively higher 3.65% annualized return.


CAUSX

1D
0.11%
1M
0.38%
YTD
-0.27%
6M
-0.84%
1Y
3.45%
3Y*
2.70%
5Y*
0.13%
10Y*
0.73%

VGIVX

1D
0.22%
1M
1.04%
YTD
1.70%
6M
1.99%
1Y
11.36%
3Y*
9.79%
5Y*
2.38%
10Y*
3.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CAUSX vs. VGIVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CAUSX
Shelton Capital Management U.S. Government Securities Fund
-0.27%6.38%-0.20%3.83%-7.74%-2.99%5.33%4.98%0.48%0.91%
VGIVX
Vanguard Emerging Markets Government Bond Index Fund Institutional Shares
1.70%13.05%6.31%10.48%-16.72%-2.41%5.83%14.03%-2.72%8.47%

Correlation

The correlation between CAUSX and VGIVX is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2014

0.42

Over the past year, CAUSX and VGIVX have become more correlated (0.63) than their long-term average of 0.42, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CAUSX vs. VGIVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CAUSX
CAUSX Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
CAUSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CAUSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
CAUSX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
CAUSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
CAUSX Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

VGIVX
VGIVX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
VGIVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGIVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGIVX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
VGIVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGIVX Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CAUSX vs. VGIVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Shelton Capital Management U.S. Government Securities Fund (CAUSX) and Vanguard Emerging Markets Government Bond Index Fund Institutional Shares (VGIVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CAUSXVGIVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.58

-0.44

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.92

2.98

-2.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.65

11.93

-9.28

CAUSX vs. VGIVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CAUSX Sharpe Ratio is 0.79, which is lower than the VGIVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CAUSX and VGIVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CAUSXVGIVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

2.85

-2.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.03

0.38

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.18

0.58

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.73

0.69

+0.04

Drawdowns

CAUSX vs. VGIVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CAUSX drawdown since its inception was -14.35%, smaller than the maximum VGIVX drawdown of -26.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAUSX and VGIVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CAUSXVGIVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.35%

-26.79%

+12.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.87%

-3.93%

+0.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.74%

-7.14%

+1.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.17%

-26.79%

+14.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.35%

-26.79%

+12.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.77%

-0.07%

-2.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.20%

-4.70%

+1.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.35%

0.98%

+0.37%

Volatility

CAUSX vs. VGIVX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Shelton Capital Management U.S. Government Securities Fund (CAUSX) is 1.41%, while Vanguard Emerging Markets Government Bond Index Fund Institutional Shares (VGIVX) has a volatility of 1.56%. This indicates that CAUSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VGIVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CAUSXVGIVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.41%

1.56%

-0.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.16%

3.35%

-0.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.51%

4.12%

+0.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.96%

6.30%

-1.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.06%

6.36%

-2.30%

CAUSX vs. VGIVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CAUSX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than VGIVX's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

CAUSX vs. VGIVX - Dividend Comparison

CAUSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.22%, less than VGIVX's 5.88% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CAUSX
Shelton Capital Management U.S. Government Securities Fund
3.22%4.55%3.16%3.08%1.46%1.13%1.15%1.42%1.45%1.41%1.72%1.38%
VGIVX
Vanguard Emerging Markets Government Bond Index Fund Institutional Shares
5.88%5.95%6.58%5.53%5.32%3.53%4.21%4.62%4.62%4.67%4.76%4.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


CAUSX and VGIVX have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VGIVX has higher volatility (1.56%) compared to CAUSX (1.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CAUSX dropped -14.35% vs VGIVX's -26.79%.

VGIVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.85 vs 0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CAUSX and VGIVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer