CATF vs. XLEI
CATF (American Century California Municipal Bond ETF) and XLEI (State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CATF is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by American Century, while XLEI is a Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P Energy Select Sector. CATF is actively managed, while XLEI is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.15, they often move in opposite directions. CATF charges 0.27%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XLEI.
Performance
CATF vs. XLEI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CATF achieves a 1.92% return, which is significantly lower than XLEI's 20.42% return.
CATF
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- 0.55%
- YTD
- 1.92%
- 6M
- 1.99%
- 1Y
- 7.98%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XLEI
- 1D
- 1.05%
- 1M
- 1.40%
- YTD
- 20.42%
- 6M
- 20.06%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CATF vs. XLEI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CATF American Century California Municipal Bond ETF | 1.92% | 5.23% |
XLEI State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | 20.42% | 6.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between CATF and XLEI is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2025 | -0.15 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CATF vs. XLEI — Risk / Return Rank
CATF
XLEI
CATF vs. XLEI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century California Municipal Bond ETF (CATF) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLEI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CATF | XLEI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.54 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.90 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.17 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CATF | XLEI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.55 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.79 | 2.65 | -1.86 |
Drawdowns
CATF vs. XLEI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CATF drawdown since its inception was -4.83%, smaller than the maximum XLEI drawdown of -7.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CATF and XLEI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CATF | XLEI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.83% | -7.98% | +3.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.77% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.58% | -0.97% | +0.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.27% | -1.52% | +0.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.79% | — | — |
Volatility
CATF vs. XLEI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CATF | XLEI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.06% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.18% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.14% | 13.16% | -10.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.33% | 13.16% | -8.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.33% | 13.16% | -8.83% |
CATF vs. XLEI - Expense Ratio Comparison
CATF has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is lower than XLEI's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
CATF vs. XLEI - Dividend Comparison
CATF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.22%, less than XLEI's 16.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
CATF American Century California Municipal Bond ETF | 3.22% | 3.40% | 1.32% |
XLEI State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | 16.59% | 10.17% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CATF and XLEI have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CATF is cheaper at 0.27% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CATF is cheaper with a 0.27% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XLEI.
XLEI has the higher dividend yield at 16.59%, compared with 3.22% for CATF.
CATF is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while XLEI is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: American Century and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.27% for CATF and 0.35% for XLEI.
Find the right allocation for CATF and XLEI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer