PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CATF vs. DBO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CATF vs. DBO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Century California Municipal Bond ETF (CATF) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CATF achieves a 0.47% return, which is significantly lower than DBO's 66.72% return.


CATF

1D
0.25%
1M
-1.70%
6M
-0.70%
YTD
0.47%
1Y
4.98%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
2.38%

DBO

1D
-5.53%
1M
17.71%
6M
53.16%
YTD
66.72%
1Y
51.44%
3Y*
12.33%
5Y*
13.64%
10Y*
11.43%
ALL TIME*
0.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$161.42K$196.46K$267.77K
$11.34M$10.71M$13.49M

CATF vs. DBO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
CATF
American Century California Municipal Bond ETF
0.47%3.78%0.62%
DBO
Invesco DB Oil Fund
66.72%-11.71%-5.17%

Correlation

The correlation between CATF and DBO is -0.35, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2024

-0.25

The correlation between CATF and DBO shifts across timeframes, from -0.35 (1 year) to -0.25 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CATF vs. DBO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CATF
CATF Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
CATF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CATF Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
CATF Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
CATF Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
CATF Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

DBO
DBO Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
DBO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBO Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
DBO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBO Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CATF vs. DBO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century California Municipal Bond ETF (CATF) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CATFDBODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.23

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.81

1.86

-0.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.65

5.64

+0.01

CATF vs. DBO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CATF Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is comparable to the DBO Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CATF and DBO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CATF vs. DBO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CATF drawdown since its inception was -4.83%, smaller than the maximum DBO drawdown of -90.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CATF and DBO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CATFDBODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.83%

-90.18%

+85.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.77%

-27.73%

+24.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.99%

-56.13%

+54.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.23%

-62.20%

+60.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.88%

9.16%

-8.28%

Volatility

CATF vs. DBO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Century California Municipal Bond ETF (CATF) is 1.04%, while Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO) has a volatility of 18.99%. This indicates that CATF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CATFDBODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.04%

18.99%

-17.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.43%

34.30%

-31.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.16%

38.86%

-35.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.25%

33.43%

-29.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.25%

32.24%

-27.99%

CATF vs. DBO - Expense Ratio Comparison

CATF has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is lower than DBO's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

CATF vs. DBO - Dividend Comparison

CATF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.34%, more than DBO's 2.11% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
CATF
American Century California Municipal Bond ETF
3.34%3.40%1.32%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
DBO
Invesco DB Oil Fund
2.11%3.51%4.68%4.59%0.66%0.00%0.00%1.63%1.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


CATF and DBO have a correlation of -0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DBO has higher volatility (18.99%) compared to CATF (1.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CATF dropped -4.83% vs DBO's -90.18%.

On 1-year performance, DBO leads with 51.44% vs 4.98% for CATF. On fees, CATF is cheaper at 0.27% per year. On volatility, CATF has been the lower-risk option at 1.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DBO has performed better with a 51.44% return vs 4.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CATF is cheaper with a 0.27% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for DBO.

CATF has the higher dividend yield at 3.34%, compared with 2.11% for DBO.

CATF is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while DBO is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: American Century and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.27% for CATF and 0.78% for DBO.

CATF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CATF and DBO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer