PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CATF vs. AVLC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CATF vs. AVLC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Century California Municipal Bond ETF (CATF) and Avantis U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (AVLC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CATF achieves a 2.29% return, which is significantly lower than AVLC's 12.96% return.


CATF

1D
-0.08%
1M
1.47%
YTD
2.29%
6M
2.24%
1Y
7.60%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AVLC

1D
-1.55%
1M
0.32%
YTD
12.96%
6M
11.82%
1Y
29.38%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CATF vs. AVLC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
CATF
American Century California Municipal Bond ETF
2.29%3.78%0.62%
AVLC
Avantis U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF
12.96%17.57%5.50%

Correlation

The correlation between CATF and AVLC is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2024

0.18

The correlation between CATF and AVLC shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (all time) to 0.30 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CATF vs. AVLC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CATF
CATF Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
CATF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CATF Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
CATF Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
CATF Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
CATF Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

AVLC
AVLC Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
AVLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVLC Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
AVLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVLC Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CATF vs. AVLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century California Municipal Bond ETF (CATF) and Avantis U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (AVLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CATFAVLCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.40

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.76

3.69

-0.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.61

16.49

-6.88

CATF vs. AVLC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CATF Sharpe Ratio is 2.49, which is comparable to the AVLC Sharpe Ratio of 2.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CATF and AVLC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CATF vs. AVLC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CATF drawdown since its inception was -4.83%, smaller than the maximum AVLC drawdown of -19.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CATF and AVLC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CATFAVLCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.83%

-19.64%

+14.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.77%

-8.00%

+5.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.22%

-2.04%

+1.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.24%

-1.97%

+0.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.79%

1.79%

-1.00%

Volatility

CATF vs. AVLC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Century California Municipal Bond ETF (CATF) is 0.80%, while Avantis U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (AVLC) has a volatility of 5.14%. This indicates that CATF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AVLC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CATFAVLCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.80%

5.14%

-4.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.22%

10.23%

-8.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.07%

13.11%

-10.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.28%

15.81%

-11.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.28%

15.81%

-11.53%

CATF vs. AVLC - Expense Ratio Comparison

CATF has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is higher than AVLC's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

CATF vs. AVLC - Dividend Comparison

CATF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.49%, more than AVLC's 1.05% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
AVLC
Avantis U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF
1.05%0.92%1.09%0.38%
CATF
American Century California Municipal Bond ETF
3.49%3.40%1.32%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CATF and AVLC have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AVLC has higher volatility (5.14%) compared to CATF (0.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CATF dropped -4.83% vs AVLC's -19.64%.

On 1-year performance, AVLC leads with 29.38% vs 7.60% for CATF. On fees, AVLC is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, CATF has been the lower-risk option at 0.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AVLC has performed better with a 29.38% return vs 7.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AVLC is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.27% for CATF.

CATF has the higher dividend yield at 3.49%, compared with 1.05% for AVLC.

CATF is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while AVLC is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: American Century and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.27% for CATF and 0.15% for AVLC.

CATF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 2.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CATF and AVLC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer