CASH.TO vs. REET
CASH.TO (Global X High Interest Savings ETF) and REET (iShares Global REIT ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CASH.TO is a Money Market fund actively managed by Global X, while REET is a REIT fund tracking the FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Global REIT Index. CASH.TO is actively managed, while REET is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CASH.TO returned 3.60%/yr vs 12.00%/yr for REET. At a correlation of -0.00, they often move in opposite directions. CASH.TO charges 0.11%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for REET.
Performance
CASH.TO vs. REET - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CASH.TO is traded in CAD, while REET is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the REET values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CASH.TO achieves a 0.91% return, which is significantly lower than REET's 14.69% return.
CASH.TO
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.15%
- YTD
- 0.91%
- 6M
- 1.03%
- 1Y
- 2.23%
- 3Y*
- 3.60%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
REET
- 1D
- 0.94%
- 1M
- 5.99%
- YTD
- 14.69%
- 6M
- 15.03%
- 1Y
- 19.36%
- 3Y*
- 12.00%
- 5Y*
- 5.52%
- 10Y*
- 5.40%
CASH.TO vs. REET - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CASH.TO Global X High Interest Savings ETF | 0.91% | 2.45% | 4.53% | 5.11% | 2.38% | 0.08% |
REET iShares Global REIT ETF | 14.69% | 3.04% | 11.34% | 7.66% | -19.29% | 8.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between CASH.TO and REET is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2021 | -0.00 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CASH.TO vs. REET — Risk / Return Rank
CASH.TO
REET
CASH.TO vs. REET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X High Interest Savings ETF (CASH.TO) and iShares Global REIT ETF (REET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CASH.TO | REET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +8.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +24.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 7.03 | 1.24 | +5.78 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 113.10 | 2.25 | +110.86 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 389.01 | 6.81 | +382.20 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CASH.TO vs. REET - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CASH.TO drawdown since its inception was -0.80%, smaller than the maximum REET drawdown of -39.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CASH.TO and REET.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CASH.TO | REET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.80% | -39.60% | +38.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.02% | -7.87% | +7.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.06% | -15.39% | +15.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.50% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.60% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.00% | -8.34% | +8.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.01% | 2.60% | -2.59% |
Volatility
CASH.TO vs. REET - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X High Interest Savings ETF (CASH.TO) is 0.08%, while iShares Global REIT ETF (REET) has a volatility of 4.38%. This indicates that CASH.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than REET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CASH.TO | REET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.08% | 4.38% | -4.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.16% | 9.22% | -9.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24% | 12.94% | -12.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.61% | 17.85% | -17.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.61% | 19.64% | -19.03% |
CASH.TO vs. REET - Expense Ratio Comparison
CASH.TO has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is lower than REET's 0.14% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
CASH.TO vs. REET - Dividend Comparison
CASH.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.19%, less than REET's 3.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CASH.TO Global X High Interest Savings ETF | 2.19% | 2.53% | 4.37% | 5.05% | 2.30% | 0.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
REET iShares Global REIT ETF | 3.29% | 3.67% | 3.64% | 3.27% | 2.43% | 3.18% | 2.65% | 5.25% | 5.73% | 3.84% | 5.37% | 3.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CASH.TO and REET have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CASH.TO is cheaper at 0.11% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CASH.TO is cheaper with a 0.11% expense ratio, compared with 0.14% for REET.
CASH.TO is categorized as Money Market, while REET is REIT. They also come from different issuers: Global X and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.11% for CASH.TO and 0.14% for REET.
Find the right allocation for CASH.TO and REET
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer