CASH.TO vs. GEQT.TO
CASH.TO (Global X High Interest Savings ETF) and GEQT.TO (iShares ESG Equity ETF Portfolio) are both exchange-traded funds - CASH.TO is a Money Market fund actively managed by Global X, while GEQT.TO is a Global Equities fund actively managed by iShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, CASH.TO returned 3.60%/yr vs 22.29%/yr for GEQT.TO. At a 0.00 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CASH.TO charges 0.11%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for GEQT.TO.
Performance
CASH.TO vs. GEQT.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CASH.TO achieves a 0.91% return, which is significantly lower than GEQT.TO's 14.29% return.
CASH.TO
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.19%
- YTD
- 0.91%
- 6M
- 1.03%
- 1Y
- 2.23%
- 3Y*
- 3.60%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GEQT.TO
- 1D
- 0.73%
- 1M
- 3.38%
- YTD
- 14.29%
- 6M
- 12.50%
- 1Y
- 30.11%
- 3Y*
- 22.29%
- 5Y*
- 14.25%
- 10Y*
- —
CASH.TO vs. GEQT.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CASH.TO Global X High Interest Savings ETF | 0.91% | 2.45% | 4.53% | 5.11% | 2.38% | 0.08% |
GEQT.TO iShares ESG Equity ETF Portfolio | 14.29% | 17.86% | 25.42% | 22.35% | -15.19% | 2.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between CASH.TO and GEQT.TO is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2021 | 0.00 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CASH.TO vs. GEQT.TO — Risk / Return Rank
CASH.TO
GEQT.TO
CASH.TO vs. GEQT.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X High Interest Savings ETF (CASH.TO) and iShares ESG Equity ETF Portfolio (GEQT.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CASH.TO | GEQT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +7.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +23.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 7.03 | 1.36 | +5.67 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 113.10 | 3.06 | +110.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 389.01 | 12.49 | +376.53 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CASH.TO vs. GEQT.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CASH.TO drawdown since its inception was -0.80%, smaller than the maximum GEQT.TO drawdown of -23.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CASH.TO and GEQT.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CASH.TO | GEQT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.80% | -23.66% | +22.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.02% | -9.29% | +9.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.06% | -18.02% | +17.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -23.66% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.75% | +0.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.00% | -5.10% | +5.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.01% | 2.27% | -2.26% |
Volatility
CASH.TO vs. GEQT.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X High Interest Savings ETF (CASH.TO) is 0.08%, while iShares ESG Equity ETF Portfolio (GEQT.TO) has a volatility of 5.72%. This indicates that CASH.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GEQT.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CASH.TO | GEQT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.08% | 5.72% | -5.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.16% | 12.25% | -12.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24% | 14.41% | -14.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.61% | 17.58% | -16.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.61% | 17.36% | -16.75% |
CASH.TO vs. GEQT.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
CASH.TO has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is lower than GEQT.TO's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
CASH.TO vs. GEQT.TO - Dividend Comparison
CASH.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.19%, more than GEQT.TO's 1.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CASH.TO Global X High Interest Savings ETF | 2.19% | 2.53% | 4.37% | 5.05% | 2.30% | 0.10% | 0.00% |
GEQT.TO iShares ESG Equity ETF Portfolio | 1.11% | 1.26% | 1.38% | 1.58% | 1.82% | 1.32% | 0.87% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CASH.TO and GEQT.TO have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CASH.TO is cheaper at 0.11% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CASH.TO is cheaper with a 0.11% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for GEQT.TO.
CASH.TO is categorized as Money Market, while GEQT.TO is Global Equities. They also come from different issuers: Global X and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.11% for CASH.TO and 0.25% for GEQT.TO.
Find the right allocation for CASH.TO and GEQT.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer