PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CAS vs. SVOL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CAS vs. SVOL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Simplify China A Shares PLUS Income ETF (CAS) and Simplify Volatility Premium ETF (SVOL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


CAS

1D
-0.49%
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SVOL

1D
-0.12%
1M
2.98%
YTD
-0.40%
6M
1.29%
1Y
10.62%
3Y*
6.58%
5Y*
6.70%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CAS vs. SVOL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CAS and SVOL is -0.20, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026

-0.20

CAS vs. SVOL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CAS
SVOL

Financial Services

43.4%
11.4%

Basic Materials

-

2.5%

Communication Services

-

7.4%

Consumer Cyclical

-

9.4%

Consumer Defensive

-

5.1%

Energy

-

4.8%

Healthcare

-

11.0%

Industrials

-

11.4%

Real Estate

-

2.8%

Technology

-

31.9%

Utilities

-

2.3%

Financial Services

CAS
43.4%
SVOL
11.4%

Basic Materials

CAS

-

SVOL
2.5%

Communication Services

CAS

-

SVOL
7.4%

Consumer Cyclical

CAS

-

SVOL
9.4%

Consumer Defensive

CAS

-

SVOL
5.1%

Energy

CAS

-

SVOL
4.8%

Healthcare

CAS

-

SVOL
11.0%

Industrials

CAS

-

SVOL
11.4%

Real Estate

CAS

-

SVOL
2.8%

Technology

CAS

-

SVOL
31.9%

Utilities

CAS

-

SVOL
2.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CAS vs. SVOL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CAS

SVOL
SVOL Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
SVOL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SVOL Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
SVOL Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
SVOL Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
SVOL Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CAS vs. SVOL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify China A Shares PLUS Income ETF (CAS) and Simplify Volatility Premium ETF (SVOL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CAS vs. SVOL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CASSVOLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-3.61

0.35

-3.96

Drawdowns

CAS vs. SVOL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CAS drawdown since its inception was -2.59%, smaller than the maximum SVOL drawdown of -33.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAS and SVOL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CASSVOLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.59%

-33.50%

+30.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.66%

-2.98%

+1.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.72%

-4.77%

+3.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.49%

Volatility

CAS vs. SVOL - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CASSVOLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.83%

20.90%

-0.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.83%

21.99%

-1.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.83%

21.92%

-1.09%

CAS vs. SVOL - Expense Ratio Comparison

CAS has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is higher than SVOL's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

CAS vs. SVOL - Dividend Comparison

CAS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SVOL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 22.10%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
CAS
Simplify China A Shares PLUS Income ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SVOL
Simplify Volatility Premium ETF
22.10%19.82%16.79%16.36%18.32%4.65%

Frequently Asked Questions


CAS and SVOL have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SVOL is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SVOL is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.88% for CAS.

SVOL has the higher dividend yield at 22.10%, compared with 0.00% for CAS.

CAS is categorized as China Equities, while SVOL is Volatility. Their fees differ too: 0.88% for CAS and 0.50% for SVOL.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CAS and SVOL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer